Ashes to Ashes, Votes to Dust: Making votes count

in #steemit7 years ago (edited)

a lot of attention both positive and negative in its approach to combat Spam. I am not going to talk about that right now but it brought up something that I didn't know, and I am certain many others don't either.Last week @timcliff wrote a post that got

Payouts from 0.001 - 0.019 do not get paid.

These are called dust amounts. What that means is that if a comment or post only has 1 cent (0.01) on it, there will be no payout. To reach the threshold and qualify for a payout, it must reach at least 0.02. This doesn't mean that a 1 cent vote has no value though, it just means that a one cent vote by itself has no value.

This has some implications I think we should all be aware of but especially the smaller voters. A 0.02 cent vote requires (on current Steem prices) ~80 Steem power at 100% voting power and 100% weight to deliver. This should already have some implications for the spammers underneath that level self-voting thinking they are going to get some rewards for it.

But, there is more to think about now. For example, some people give 1% cent votes as agreements or read receipts but, if you have low SP or voting power, that won't be enough for a payout to somebody.

For example, it will take 500 Steem Power (SP) at 100% Voting Power (VP) and 15% strength to reach 2 cents.

dust vote.PNG

However, it will take 500 Steem Power (SP) at 80% Voting Power (VP) and 20% strength to reach 2 cents.

dust vote 2.PNG

I am using the 500 SP because that is about where the Steemit slider appears however, places like Busy.org have a slider all the time. But, if one has 100 SP, this is what it looks like with full voting power.

dust vote 3.PNG

What this means is that all of the comment votes that don't reach that 0.02 cent level do not count. Again, implications. Unfortunately, this means that small votes given are just encouragement awards that don't go toward building accounts unless more votes are added on top to reach the 0.02 level. And, this is where there is an opportunity for people to actually be a part of the community by helping other accounts out.

  • If you see a comment or post that deserves a payout but doesn't reach the 0.02 cent level, add a vote on top if you can.
  • If you are on a friend's blog and they have tried to reward comments but don't have power to reach it, add a vote if you can
  • If you see posts that are under 2 cents and are real posts, add a vote.

If you have a larger account with 1000 SP, this is the minimum at 100% VP you need to add. 8% to give a payout if the only voter.

dust vote 4.PNG

Those people giving 1% votes? This is the minimum SP needed to give a 1% vote and get a payout:

dust vote 5.PNG

7500 Steem Power. And, that is at current prices of 3.00 dollars for Steem.

What this means for small accounts trying to community build by adding at least some value to people's comments and posts, you are unable to spread as widely as you are likely going to need to add higher voting percentages. This is more important for comments as it is common that a comment will only get a vote from the author of the post. This might mean you have to be a little more discerning and critical of what comments you upvote.

This should also serve as a warning to commentors also as this should encourage better quality comments, spam isn't going to cut it. Also, a reminder, self-voting comments turns many people off voting on top. I don't like it when people do it on my blog, no matter who they are so, I will often skip voting on them.

Now, my position on this.

 
I vote on many comments if they add value to the conversation. I notice people cutting lines from my text and saying, "I agree" and that is it. Most of the time, it seems very insincere unless I already know the person well enough to understand behind the words. Add value, or no vote. Look like spam and get flagged like spam. I am going to get stricter again.

Next, the people who vote on my replies to them as an agreement or read receipt. Kind of like a thumbs up. It is appreciated but, unless you have the Steem Power to spare or really think it is worth it, please, I ask you not to vote on my comment on my own posts from now on. I would rather you find other comments or posts that are deserving of some payout and bump them up instead. You can comment on me instead of voting. Of course, if you have the Voting Power to spare, I am not going to flag you for it and it is appreciated.

I am also going to try to visit smaller blogs a little more often and bump some of the comments that deserve it. I know that it isn't much but, it might help the blog grow slightly or, at least encourage better quality comments. If you see me do this on your blog and don't want me to, just say so and I will stop it.

I have a feeling that because many people don't know about the dust threshold, they are thinking that their self-voted spam is earning something. Well, it appears it isn't. This also means that if you come across self voted spam, as long as you don't vote on it and push it over the 0.02 limit, it won't get a payout. Of course, if you have the power to spare, check their comments section and if they are indeed a spammer, flag them.

This dust level has something to do with the way the blockchain works and will change slightly in the next HF, Velocity. You can read about it here and perhaps work something different out of it.

I wrote this (hoping the information is correct) because I have got a couple messages over the last week about it from some small community builders asking what they should do. Again, I recommend to keep building. If you can bump them into earning something great, but even if you can't, it is encouraging to get votes still. It is the thought that counts. I am hoping those that engage often with each other can team up a little and help one another in this regard too.

I hope this clears something up or at least, raises some questions and attracts some answers from some people who might know a lot more than I.

Taraz
[ a Steemit original ]

steemnow.com calculatorThe images are taken from @penguinpablo's

Sort:  

I am also going to try to visit smaller blogs a little more often and bump some of the comments that deserve it. I know that it isn't much but,

Oh it is a lot, believe me. I got the chance to find you in the early days of my Steemit journey, and even a 1% upvote from you meant a great deal for me. Just the knowledge that there's a bigger player wanting to support newcomers is a big boost of motivation. Don't underestimate your importance to your little followers Taraz. It might be more significant than you think :).

If I see a post or comment at .02 a lot of times I will upvote it to try and make sure it gets paid out. The .01 posts with multiple upvotes are what really sucks. :( I'll also often let people know that their self upvotes don't count when I see those .00 or .01 self upvotes.

The small accounts actually meana lot to me because they are often the ones who engage well. I do understand the larger accounts being spread thin though as I know for myself, it is very, very hard to get to comments these days with the depth I would like.

@tarazkp They do engage well and that's been my favorite part of steemit so far, the community! Thanks for supporting the smaller accounts! I don't know if you want me to upvote your comment or not haha. I'll save it for a smaller account today

@tarazkp this was also news to me. I need to check the data but i think as the comments table in the DB includes all payout, dust too, anyone from #blockchainbi will need to be aware of this for future calculations.

Have resteemed

Great post!
The price of steem does impact vote value.
I have been trying to educate people when I see them self upvoting and thinking their votes count.
I think .01 should be the earnings threshold.
You can use bots to "get around" the threshold.

This is fucking stupid.

1 cent spammers are not the major problem on steem. This doesn't effect the assholes in trending earning $1000 per post on absolute shit. This affects tiny accounts making a few cents.

Yeah, spammers can technically make a million posts earning 1 cent on each...but that's what bandwidth was supposed to deal with, if it actually worked. Remember that fiasco? Spammers still spamming, but legit users couldn't post.

I'm pretty sure I made less than 2 cents on my first few posts. Fuck these idiots. "Let's solve a problem by making a bigger problem!"

Raising the threshold would be even worse. I have made less than $1 on some posts I've poured my heart and soul into.

How can they even think this is a bigger issue than accounts getting thousands of dollars for absolute shit posts, and becoming whales, and then being the ones that determine who is rewarded in the future?

This is fucking stupid.

Yes but, I think it has always been this way here (we just didn't know). If you read the velocity post it hints at why. Something to do with bandwidth and flooding the system. Perhaps it is a legacy issue.

1 cent spammers are not the major problem on steem. This doesn't effect the assholes in trending earning $1000 per post on absolute shit. This affects tiny accounts making a few cents.

Indeed.

Raising the threshold would be even worse. I have made less than $1 on some posts I've poured my heart and soul into.

Yeah, I agree. There are other ways to combat it but, that is what Tim's discussion was about.

So many complications and layers of complexity. The complexity here is killing it.

You totally did the quote and agree bit! HAHA!

There's an issue my brain keeps going back to. All those posts that minnows voted on that didn't get over the dust threshold...they basically lost their VP.

What happens if people start pushing the idea that if you're a minnow, you shouldn't vote on anything that hasn't been voted on yet, unless you can push it over the dust threshold? The minnow problem will get even worse here. Often when you're new it's only tiny little minnows and plankton voting on you.

Hell, to this day occasionally a large percentage of my payout is tons of small votes on comments. Although now I know all the minnow votes were just fucking disappearing if they didn't have someone with more power to back them up.

There is even some fun and useful spam. Like those stupid achievements. I kinda like those. I bet they make a lot less due to this dust threshold.

You totally did the quote and agree bit! HAHA!

I did.
...but, I did add something too ;) Also.. look how many damn comments I have had to answer... give me a break :P

There's an issue my brain keeps going back to. All those posts that minnows voted on that didn't get over the dust threshold...they basically lost their VP.

Yeah, :/ I wish I had known about it soon er as I would have changed some of the advice I have given.

Although now I know all the minnow votes were just fucking disappearing if they didn't have someone with more power to back them up.

The votes stack of course but, most comments don't get many votes usually. I am glad I know about this now though and hopefully more people will adjust for it.

There is even some fun and useful spam. Like those stupid achievements. I kinda like those. I bet they make a lot less due to this dust threshold.

Steemitboard? I use that sight all the time for various numbers and Arcange has other projects ongoing too. Plus, you can stop it just by commenting stop.

Yes i just don't see why others dont vote its not like its coming out of their pockets? Im just a week old and learning but i give my votes to random people just because i like what the post has in it, either its pictures or content ❣ i really dont care if they follow me or i follow them its that i think it deserves it. Or am i wrong?

Nah, that's how you're supposed to do it, more or less. You find good content you like and upvote it. If it's really good, you might follow them, but whether you upvote it or not should not be dependent on if you know them.

But thats how whales work? They get so much upvotes bc their followers just do it to get it in return?

Well, a lot of whales do have a lot of people sucking up to them. I'm pretty sure many of them just upvote content they like, just like the rest of us, but there are a few corrupt ones. Many of them use various means to auto-vote as well, since it's hard when your 100% vote is over $100. You can't exactly easily find posts worth a lot of money that haven't already been voted up that high. So they follow voting trails, and auto-vote some users with a certain percentage.

Wow if a vote at 100% gives $100 wouldn't that mean that a 1% would be $1 ? I can only deam that someday i can help others with that kind of kindness. I mean its not like we have to pay with real money from our pockets to get steem points.

Well, not necessarily money from our pockets, but we do earn it in a way. It's like a company paying us in shares. It's directly convertible to Steem, which is a cryptocurrency.

I read of these crumbs the other day and will admit to feeling a little crushed. I finally reached a point where it says it will award .01. While not much, it is better than .00 (or so I thought). It won't change how I interact on the site, but I feel bad that I can't really reward those who I interact with, other than with my wit and charming disposition. 😁

other than with my wit and charming disposition. 😁

This goes a long way.

And even if your vote is only 01, it is nothing to worry about. You read or see something you like you vote, and leave a comment. That person may look your site over. The biggest thing to look at here is that it is 100% waste of time for you to vote your own comments up. I look at the votes a comment and a post have first, if you upvote your post that is generally fine, if you upvote your own comment, sorry I am one of those that will not upvote a comment the commenter self voted. When you upvote your own post, if no one else votes for it, your self vote just got "dusted". So find good comments or good post to vote on.

One thing to think about also when looking at a post to vote on, if it has 20+ votes, the fact you voted may be buried, yes you may get a curation pay out (0.001SP), but a smaller less voted post may be best for starting out. However it really depends on the question of why you are here, and there really is a lot of reasons, some to make money, some to play games, some to blog, some to gain fame, some to...well you get the idea. For myself, I like to vote and to comment, and to read, and I try to help where I can, especially the new users.

if you upvote your post that is generally fine, if you upvote your own comment, sorry I am one of those that will not upvote a comment the commenter self voted.

I agree with this, although I chose not to vote on my last post either. I am still feeling my way here as to my contributions posting as the first posts I made, many were things I could have made money on self publishing and they were met with crickets here. I am to vain to post memes or just idle cheerleader crap that you see so many posting.

I had to step back as well, as I found myself voting on so many posts and replies to my comments that my voting power was dipping down to 50% and under. I finally got it back to 100% over the last weekend, at the expense of ignoring some posts I normally may have weighed in upon.

I am looking forward to the day that my vote can reward another monetarily though. I know how it has made me feel, and how some who are not as blessed as myself feel. When I first got here, I came across a post from someone from Nigeria I think. He was talking how Steem had blessed him. He showed his old shoes he used to wear, and the new pair he was able to purchase with Steem. He also had pictures of him and his friends eating in a restaurant. Something he was unaccustomed to doing. His post really touched me, and put my life into perspective.

Thanks for sharing. It is through these type of interactions I am shaping my expectations of my Steemit experience.

I came across this post just in time. I was pretty excited to finally have 0.01 to spread around. Now I won't waste it on the few comments I get on my posts. It will be put to much better use to visit those people and vote where it will count more. Us little guys really do have to use each penny wisely. I am glad to find so many people sharing knowledge. It can be hard as a newbie to come up with a strategy, especially when not knowing all the facts.
BTW comment section here is pure gold. I learned all kinds of interesting bits. Also found some new people to check out :)

Now I won't waste it on the few comments I get on my posts.

I would not view your vote on comments on your post a waste. You are doing pretty good, 118 followers since joining in March. I am sure a few of them were likely people that commented on your content. Voting on comments (at least a few of them), and replying back to your audience is a good way to build a loyal group of followers. Take a minute to think about it. Would you continually provide an upvote to an individual that had good content, but never in your last four visit upvote any comments made or even replied to any comments? Can you imagine being in a comedy club and the act you just watched was really good, lots of applause, and the comedian does not even acknowledge the audience and just walks off stage with out so much as a thank you. Are you bringing your friends to see him the next night? IF you want to grow you have to engage with your audience. You don't need to upvote every comment, you do not need to reply to every comment, you should upvote the best comment/s and reply to a few of the comments, that is how you get repeat customers, they took the time to read, to comment and to likely vote on your post, you need to acknowledge them.

I think you are wrong. Here is why. I was upvoting all of my comments. Obviously a mistake. Those votes would be more useful on the cementers blog for now. When I have more SP I can go back to that. Many followers are small fish like me. those pennies matter a lot. It is more considerate to be mindful that they get a tiny bit of pay out.
Also If you take a peek you will see I respond to everybody i feel at my level I absolutely do need to respond to every single one. Maybe for someone like you who gets more traffic that is unrealistic, but at my level there is no reason not to engage with every comment I get.
I know you are trying to be helpful. I feel you have made assumptions and misjudged without looking at my history. Would you continue to visit a comedy club where a heckler remained unaddressed when the rest of the audience was enjoying the show ? I truly do appreciate you trying to help. At the same time I can't believe anyone would just assume I am being rude to my followers.

I apologize, I did not mean for my comment to sound rude. I honestly do not think a vote on a comment is a waste. A comment back on good comments are needed, and I did not mean to imply you did not reply to your commenters.

There are a lot of different strategies to growing on steemit.- - - As for Hecklers, at every opportunity - (thank you) - I plug for an upgrade to the "mute" button to a "Blocked" button. It would work like the mute button, only no one would see any comments from that person ever on any of your pages when you have them "blocked". Of course this "blocked" button would not prevent them from downvoting your page. A new steemcleaners blacklist would need to be added that would address retaliatory downvoting however.

Thank you so much for that. I shouldn't have said you are wrong. I disagree for my situation but your way is great for you. When I am a bigger fish like you I can do the same.
I was a bit crushed to find out I have been upvoting every comment and my votes all turned to dust. That is a lot pennies that someone would have loved to have had. I do feel that I wasted them. Now I know better I will stack them where the intended person is sure to receive something.
It means a lot to me to try and make a difference here. I have no power so all I really have are my little comments right now. For you the right thing is upvote everyone and return a few comments. For me it is opposite for now. I comment a LOT. I have only made 8 posts and 360 comments.
Strategy is something I think about a lot. I am always open to advice and truly appreciate you taking the time for me. BTW I have a little sidekick who resembles your avatar :)

I try o help a lot of the new users, because there was not a lot of help when I first joined. I can not tell you how many times I read or got told also, "What my post was good enough for a comment but not a vote?" I hated seeing that, and I have a few people on mute that used that line. I have also been flagged, and lost reputation over it, just for asking a question that was slightly out of context, and received very little help for that. So I do understand about wanting to try to help, because I did also, and now can, and do try.

I comment a LOT

Likewise, I love to comment. There is so much good stuff, and most of my comments actually do go on post that get very little attention. I like stuff that is pleasing to the eye, nice pictures and art, they do not get enough attention sometimes comment wise, but I am getting much better at my picture and art work comments.

I have a feeling that because many people don't know about the dust threshold, they are thinking that their self-voted spam is earning something.

... and there are those that thought that their lonely $0.01 vote is going to the recipient :-)

After raging on that post we met on, I started an initiative that would do much more for my community than my upvote could do. A discord group and a community upvote bot that's built to upvote the new and promising members of the community.

I believe that we will get enough SP delegated to support ~20 newcomers with a modest daily upvote.

... and there are those that thought that their lonely $0.01 vote is going to the recipient :-)

:/ Yeah, I think back to all of the times I was trying to give people rewards that they might never have got. Meh, at least going forward adjustment is possible now.

Good luck with the group. I think you will find that enjoying being part of the community will add value in itself and in time, will likely add financial value too.

Thanks so much I wasnt aware of this - and in sure like 90% of steemians arent either.

People should be educated that upvoting yout own comments is poor form -and at the lower level its a complete waste of an upvote that could have gone towards an article you liked.

I dont think that increasing the threshhold will do much apart from making people mad.

Maybe once people have been flagged as spammers then their threshold should increase - once they have been a proven spammer then we should be harsh.

On the flipside i think alot of spammers dont actually know their comments come across like spam so maybe we need to be lenient and educate people

Hi there Tarazkp ~ been a while as have been travelling and reordering our lives :)

This is an intriguing post and makes me wonder if you ever sleep what with your consistent posting of quality and backroom knowledge!

I will need to read it several times to really grasp the implications of your suggested voting strategy which seems to be of value.

Offline for about 5 weeks, except for phone access, I never got the chance to truly thankyou for the delegated SP you generously afforded me. It certainly made a difference and it was unfortunate that several of the weeks coincided with our move. That said I made sure to make great use of it prior to our getting our wiggle on!

Also thanks for the upvotes.

I hope you and yours are well and send you a virtual hug and pint.

xox

You are most welcome and I hope the travel and move went well. I have dropped by a couple times to have a look and give you a little bump from time to time.

No... not much sleep in the last year.

Gotta get that shut eye ~ says the 'Dormouse'!

I appreciate greatly your bumps as I often appear to be blowing in the breeze indulging myself with vanity posting :)

Heyho ~ onwards and upwards.

Enjoy your week.

xox

I was really surprised to learn that on Tim's post too. Thankfully I generally give people at least .02 when I upvote their comments on my posts already, but it has highlighted for me how important it is to be mindful of it always.

Also, you're right that in responding to an author on their own post when he/she replies to me I will give an upvote if I don't think the conversation needs to continue, but want to express appreciation for their reply. I think it's good you've declined to receive those upvotes, and think that should become an unofficial norm. That way we can all direct more of our upvotes to quality comments that maybe have an upvote on them from an author who can't give .02 with a single vote, even at 100% allocation.

I want to note that I don't agree with you about not upvoting people who have upvoted themselves. This just shows all the more why people should NOT be penalized for upvoting themselves, if that's what it takes to turn a .01 upvote into a .02 upvote!

And I also know that I sometimes will upvote one of my comments just because I know that post author doesn't read all his comments, only the ones at the top of the page!

I also think it is fine apart from this really, so long as the person's overall upvote ratios are no more than 50% going to themselves across their activity on the platform. I think it's most fair to simply upvote a comment you think is good, but I know you and I also disagree about downvoting to express the assessment of an overvalued payout, so I suspect this variance of opinion stems from that one.

Where I draw the line is with paying bots to upvote one's own comments. I gave this a try for a couple weeks that I just didn't have time to post much and was only commenting on the posts of others, but it just didn't feel right to me. Now when I come across a comment where I can see they used an upvote bot I'm like, "really?" LOL

I will skip to my arguments ;)

I want to note that I don't agree with you about not upvoting people who have upvoted themselves. This just shows all the more why people should NOT be penalized for upvoting themselves, if that's what it takes to turn a .01 upvote into a .02 upvote!

The reason is ordering the comments section. So self-upvoting means that if I give a 1% vote to all, the self voted comment goes to the top where i might not want it. Now, I have the ability/option to not have that happen so, I might have to adjust (unvote and revote) to get comments back in a suitable order. This can be very expensive for a small account.

And I also know that I sometimes will upvote one of my comments just because I know that post author doesn't read all his comments, only the ones at the top of the page!

It also means larger accounts can hijack the top position, something I don't like if the post doesn't warrant it. So, there are caveats but, if someone hasn't visited my blog before and made this assumption, what does that say about the platform and them? Where do they normally spend their time?

I also think it is fine apart from this really, so long as the person's overall upvote ratios are no more than 50% going to themselves across their activity on the platform.

The 50% rule is a decent approach for many.

but I know you and I also disagree about downvoting to express the assessment of an overvalued payout, so I suspect this variance of opinion stems from that one.

With organic, non-circle-jerk voting. I generally won't downvote. This platform hasn't been that way since I have been here.

Where I draw the line is with paying bots to upvote one's own comments.

I find it strange.

When I first started (last July), I don’t remember much talk about NOT self-voting. It felt strange to upvote myself, but I remember reading comments to the opposite effect - i.e. “pay to play,” “why should I upvote you if you don’t upvote yourself?”

I took a break from Steemit when we got the call about our twin girls, and jumped back on late Jan. Now, it seems there’s a reversal. I’ve been self-voting (posts, not comments) mainly because (until recently) my followers are small voters, so I know I’m making the pool bigger for them.

Most of them don’t post regularly, but I will read and upvote if they do and also upvote their comments.

I haven’t had much time to think about this, but it’s been coming up a lot. Now I’m thinking I could either stop self-voting posts or I could do a weekly giveaway of the earnings from self-voting so that all followers can still benefit from my vote being in the pool. What do you think?

Self-voting posts is fine (unless you post 10 times a day and the content is crap).

Now I’m thinking I could either stop self-voting posts or I could do a weekly giveaway of the earnings from self-voting so that all followers can still benefit from my vote being in the pool. What do you think?

Too many giveaways. Self-vote your own posts (not comments) and vote the content you appreciate. I think that is enough and if everyone actually did it, the place would be much healthier.

Thank you! This is really helpful and encouraging!

A number of smaller community builders like newbieresteemday greetersguild were surprised by the dust threshold and a couple of us like @beeyou wrote posts about it.

For most part the posts is not really an issue for me because most legitimate account I see even if they don't have a larger audience are able to reach above the threshold.
When I first started I usually got at least .05 cents.

It was the comments that grinded the gears of a lot of people especially me because here I thought that I was helping people build their accounts and rewarding engagement only to find out it becomes dust.
A lot of people say its the thought that counts but to me I respond to almost all comments and give an upvote when it adds value.
I don't have a lot of SP backing me because I am just a minnow but I am a firm believer of rewarding good behavior but seeing what I do turns to dust leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

That post had the positive effect of letting a lot of people know about the threshold and I admire Tim to be able to have the guts to bring it center stage and draw all the criticism. He wasn't the one that coded it in the first place (I am not sure)

Given that I gave my solution of increasing the weight of my vote to make sure that it is 0.03 to take lowering price of Steem in the 3.5 window just to be sure.
Also for Redfishes and minnows that can afford to do that because it would take 20% to almost 40% weight to go to a post of that person that left a great Comment and upvote a post they like.
It is a win-win for me when we start behaving positively like that.

Great find @maverickinvictus. Difference between our posts and others is the audience. We have the audience of the redfish and minnows. Happy that @tarazkp wrote the post to share with his audience as well! Everyone should know about the 0.02 SBD dust threshold.

I know and that dust threshold should have been placed in the economics section of the FAQ.
As much as I want a thought it counts reward for a good Comment I'd rather give a real reward.

Agree on FAQ and real reward!

I want to show my support to you but I drained my VP with upvoting comments tonight on Dave’s post for Lynn and Brian. So many from our community helping out there and I wanted to help with my support. Will have to remember to loop back around. 🙂

It was the comments that grinded the gears of a lot of people especially me because here I thought that I was helping people build their accounts and rewarding engagement only to find out it becomes dust.

A lot of people have this feeling (including me). It wasn't that long ago that my 1% was not enough and I thought I was doing the right thing.

That post had the positive effect of letting a lot of people know about the threshold and I admire Tim to be able to have the guts to bring it center stage and draw all the criticism. He wasn't the one that coded it in the first place (I am not sure)

No he wasn't the coder, he just knows the details. His discussion started many other discussions which is the point of it in my opinion. Offer an unsuitable solution and then discuss heavily.

Given that I gave my solution of increasing the weight of my vote to make sure that it is 0.03 to take lowering price of Steem in the 3.5 window just to be sure.

Yep, I agree this is the way to go.

It is a win-win for me when we start behaving positively like that.

This might actually make the platform better in some ways considering it might improve comments and make people think a little more where their vote goes.

His discussion started many other discussions which is the point of it in my opinion. Offer an unsuitable solution and then discuss heavily.

Indeed it was a spark that was needed to discuss, give people to weighh in their two cents, offer options and arrive at action plans that were right for them.

This might actually make the platform better in some ways considering it might improve comments and make people think a little more where their vote goes.

And we need to make more engagement and good comments. Too many posts that don't have comments and are mere placeholder posts for self votes and bots. If we are to move as a platform we need people who will be passionate and engaged. We have a great product. It is not a perfect system but we need to do what we can to make positive changes to the system.

Every time I think of a topic to write about regarding the mechanics of Steem, you one up my unpenned thoughts in excellent and clear posts.

Please, get out of my head! :p

lol.

Please, get out of my head! :p

It is where I get my craziest ideas from though.

"If you are on a friend's blog and they have tried to reward comments but don't have power to reach it, add a vote if you can" I agree :)
I noticed that a few times ago that my voting power was useless in many cases, (either it helps for payout or not) but instead of giving a cent to the post's owner I try to go for the comments that complete the conversation, blog or whatever the missing part. And I believe it's more helpful for both sides. It basically encourages people to engage, give us something to read.
For you, you wouldn't even notice that amount, on your payout but your followers/friends especially planktons or minnows would be quite happy with that amount + appreciation for a reasonable comment.

And I believe it's more helpful for both sides. It basically encourages people to engage, give us something to read.

Yes. I used to get a few votes from blocktrades from time to time and after I had voted on the comments, they would vote on the first 5-6 with 1 or 2 percent. This was 3-8 dollars at the time. It was a massive boost for the commentors. However, i do think that my 7 cents is at least something. On most days, I think 1-2 100% votes goes to comments I get or on other posts.

For you, you wouldn't even notice that amount, on your payout but your followers/friends especially planktons or minnows would be quite happy with that amount + appreciation for a reasonable comment.

I am in a position that I don't require comment votes. It was only last Hardfork that is became a thing and with klinear rewards arriving, the self-vote comment was born.

self-upvoted for visibility yeah bite me. Even the top comment was $0.5 people tripling that amount to get visibility with their own votes.

Frankly, I believe you couldn't get these much comments just with the upvotes it's really worthy that you are truly engaging, reading and responding to each comment as possible. And I'm even feel bad when I already get a good response, asking myself is that vote really necessary we were just talking about a subject that we both into.

I notice people cutting lines from my text and saying, "I agree" and that is it. Most of the time, it seems very insincere

Sincerely I agree!

Of course, if you have the Voting Power to spare, I am not going to flag you for it and it is appreciated.

Yeah your still getting my I read it votes but they are always more then 2 cents.

Of course, if you have the power to spare, check their comments section and if they are indeed a spammer, flag them.

I do this when annoyed, fun to slap them around a little and return the rewards to the pool where they belong.

When I read this on the other post it was very surprising to me. My week was crazy due to work so haven't had time to research this. But it really is to bad that the smallest members votes really don't mean anything on a comment, but at the same time it's great that the spammers aren't getting anything for those .01 votes.

This was on my list of posts to research and write about. Instead I'm just resteeming yours...lol.

Yeah your still getting my I read it votes but they are always more then 2 cents.

appreciated.

but at the same time it's great that the spammers aren't getting anything for those .01 votes.

There is something satisfying about this :)

This was on my list of posts to research and write about. Instead I'm just resteeming yours...lol.

Again, appreciated :)

Realized I was so tired last night I forgot to resteem. Was on 5 straight days of 2-4 hours of sleep due to a big show and added stress to do well as our boiler blew up early in the week. Was without heat for the week and making due with space heaters until we can replace it with nighttime temps getting into the 20's F, sub zero for the C world it was a stressful week. But temps are rising and the show went great so feeling much better today, plus 12 hours of sleep to catch up felt great.

It is appreciated. Hope all went well.

Show did go well. I needed a good show due to the boiler issue and I had one. Nice when things work out.

@tarazkp, I read about this some days back and I was quite worried as to the effect on accounts with 100% VP of 0.01 for instance. But as you said it, going out there and supporting quality comments and posts that are below the 0.02 will go a long way in generating payout for those accounts.

I need to get to 500 SP or start using busy.org. voting 100% is draining my VP. I can't upvote as much as I want to. It's annoying.

use busy, it is free to use so why not. Also, posting through there and using the tag #busy as one of the 5 tags will get a vote from them that will help a lot (if their bot is working).

Oh that's cool, I will log in there asap. Thank you.

And yet, there are a ton of peps adjoined & following a bunch of dumbass blind trails/guilds always raising a dust storm cloud of trifling upvotes at 10% and less of their VP when they don't even reach the 100SP.

Yeah, avoid reading chumps. That those dark glasses will do you good!! }:)

(Actually, I need to resteem this for my countrymen & low SP followers. So they know & understand these thangs a lil bit better)

As long as the payout of the post goes over that 2 cents, they will get something. But, self-upvoting alone with 2SP?

Yeah, avoid reading chump. That those dark glasses will do you good!! }:)

:)

I did learn about the Dust Thesshold a week ago. Devoted 2 posts about it. One in which I did explain the thingy and the second one in which I did gave tips how to surpass it.

Also I did change my voting behavior, increasing the upvotesof comments!
If do upvote posts, but aren’t so generous anymore with upvoting replies of the author because I did already upvtethe post!
And to make it clear, I wont flag you if you drop by at my blog and give a post an upvote 😁 Helping other with an upvote, to push a value above the limit was one of them. But also #steembasicincome or just writing the post with busy.org and using the tag busy can really help!

or just writing the post with busy.org and using the tag busy can really help!

Yes, this is a good idea.

And to make it clear, I wont flag you if you drop by at my blog and give a post an upvote 😁

:P

I have seen that post by Tim, and a few others talking about the dust level. I still have a question about it, because I get a lot of this type payout Claim rewards: 0.018 SBD and 0.008 STEEM POWER, as you can see the sbd did not pass over the dust threshold. Granted I have not seen one that was only SBD, but a lot in that award range for me. I vote mostly on smaller/new user accounts and comments.

<p dir="auto">Since seeing and learning about the dust threshold, I have done like you and if I see a poster trying to reward a comment, I try to lend a hand with a two sent upvote so that the posters reward is not "dusted". The same if I see a commenter try to reward another comment that they found relevant to the discussion. I hope this will bring more eyes on the vote visibility, and I appreciate your willingness to assist the new users also. I know you have assisted myself in the past when I was first joining and learning steemit.

Yes, but the payout points were higher than that.
Going on those numbes (in my head and after curation) the payout was 50/50 around so around 0.018 + (0.008 x 3) = 0.042 + curation(~20%). A 0.05 cent payout amount?

Makes sense, after posting I did a more closer examine of my wallet and rewards, and really did not see any from the newer users, which is fine. While they may not be able to help me, I can certainly help them. And I do get a lot of 0.05 cent payouts.

I am glad you picked this topic up and explained it so that me and others will not only learn from it , but support the comments of others that don't meet the threshold . I and I think others had questions about it and had no where to get the question answered . thanks

building and working as a community is the way to go . Ref: to the 3 bullet points

I think that if people understand it better, they can work out ways where it isn't too restrictive. Glad to help :)

I hope this clears something up or at least, raises some questions and attracts some answers from some people who might know a lot more than I

This has cleared a lot, i used to notice the figures in my incoming rewards would just disappear on the redeem time and reset back to 0. Major headache(for me every cent matters) but i felt it was just the system in a way, but now i can actually understand.

Next, the people who vote on my replies to them as an agreement or read receipt. Kind of like a thumbs up. It is appreciated but, unless you have the Steem Power to spare or really think it is worth it, please, I ask you not to vote on my comment on my own posts from now on. I would rather you find other comments or posts that are deserving of some payout and bump them up instead. You can comment on me instead of voting. Of course, if you have the Voting Power to spare, I am not going to flag you for it and it is appreciated.

I appreciate that this is your view on this, you're one of a kind, believe me

Thanks i will begin to do as you have advised.

Major headache(for me every cent matters) but i felt it was just the system in a way, but now i can actually understand.

I think there might be many in this situation.

Thanks i will begin to do as you have advised.

Glad it helps and hopefully you can adjust and make up for it. :)

I have never heard of this dust amount issue until today when I read one of the post you made a few minutes ago and I was totally lost. So, I decided to read down your blog for some posts I missed. This is quite educating, I try to bump up a couple of good comments I see around but I think I'll have to watch my voting power more closely these days to ensure it doesn't in below 75-80%. Thanks Mr Taraz, we learn everyday.

Do curation rewards have a dust threshold? I'm seeing a lot of smaller accounts only appear to be getting 1 or 2 curation payouts per day, (according to steemdb)

Well, if their vote is the only vote and it doesn't reach the 0.019 threshold there is no payout so no curation. If, the payout does come, they will get a payout but, that is going to depend on when they vote i think. If you have 15 SP and vote on a trending article late, what are the chances of getting anything?

... I think...

If you use speedvoter and vote at 30 minutes I think you have a good chance. There is a LOT of automation on this site.

I had no idea about the "dust" amounts D: which makes me pretty glad that I make my minimum votes 2c (according to busy's slider anyway) for no other reason than the thought of "my 2c" still amuses my small mind.

goatsig

@tarazkp I always enjoy your posts.

I invited you for the Minnowbooster whitelist because of your consistent high quality content and your contribution to Steemit in general.

Please check www.minnowbooster.com/whitelist to check your white list account and for more info on what the whitelist means for quality authors in general.

breathing text.jpg

It makes a world of a difference for us planktons to receive upvotes for our efforts, and knowing that we don't have the power that some seem to take for granted plays a significant role in how some of us behave on the platform - at least, I can say this for myself. I've noticed there are some people who post only one liner comments with no real depth - I looked at an account today and wondered why this person had more reputation than myself and then I took a quick glance at their activity, the account is mostly amateurish photography and a ton of comments on other people's posts, well over 4000 posts. I have a long ways to go to reach that amount of content, and my vote only counts for one penny right now. I do my best to think about what I've read, and give my honest feedback instead of the usual, "Nice post, I like your photo." To build rapport and community I believe we actually have to be communicating with others, giving genuine feedback instead of spamming to get noticed.
Maybe I'm taking the wrong approach, but I will surely be on the look out for posts that I can add my penny's worth of appreciation towards. Thanks for bringing this issue to the community's attention.

I think you're taking the right approach. Relationship building counts for a lot, even if you can only give a penny and that doesn't wind up getting paid out unless another person also gives at least a penny (or several join in upvoting to reach that with there sub-penny upvotes). Getting paid definitely counts for a lot on a paid blogging platform, but so does finding people who genuinely appreciate your content and want to engage with you in a more meaningful way than you can find on any other platform.

Early on in my journey on here I found some folks who were creating great content and responding to all the meaningful comments on their posts. I met a lot of cool people in the comments on their posts, because they stimulated people revealing their best ideas by sharing such meaningful posts to begin with.

Taraz presents another great idea, which is to find people you think like the same content you might like, then take a look at their feed so you can find more good people to follow.

Last thought, I don't know if this is an option for you, but I also spent 15 STEEM buying delegated SP so that my 100% upvote is worth about 12 cents (at full VP), which allows me to parcel out 25% upvotes and still be getting someone paid with each vote. I've had to then work to get back that 15 STEEM so that I could still afford the delegations in the next month, so it might not be worth the extra stress to you. Just sharing my experience in case it helps.

I know it's time consuming replying to all comments on a post, that's why it's best to be selective - just as it's best to be selective on who we give our vote to on the platform knowing we only have so much voting power and once that's used up the dreaded waiting period to be back at 100 % I've also made the mistake of what I consider OVER voting and used up all of my voting power in the past. Now I truly search out worthwhile content or content from long term friends and lend my vote.

I've been browsing around a little using the feed suggestion Taraz mentioned, reading the comment section of some of my favorite content creators for ideas that I find intriguing. As he said, there's plenty to read, it just takes weeding through.

Finally, I think I could afford buying delegated SP but I'm not sure how to get started. If you have any suggestions on beginning, I'd appreciate it as I'm not even remotely aware of where to start. I haven't made it to 50 SP yet, but I'm interested in growing my account. I think it would be worth the effort as my aim is to spend more time on this platform than I have in the past several weeks. Thanks for the suggestions and your response!

I had the same experience when I first joined. I was so excited about being able to upvote people's amazing comments, and all these wonderful conversations I was having on here. Then the next thing I knew one of the steemit stats sites would be like, "you'll be at full voting power again in 50 hours!" I had to slow it way down. It definitely helped to get enough SP to be able to make partial votes still pay people a decent amount.

In terms of how to do that, the easiest place is within your wallet, but the cheapest place is on Minnowbooster.net. It's kind of involved for the step-by-step but if you search for "buy delegated steem power" you'll probably find one of the many articles that walk you through it. @ilyastarar has some good articles on this and I think I'd followed the directions on one of his.

You can try it for a month and see how you like the experience. I'm only in my 2nd month of doing it and the jury is still out for me. I'm must more sensitive than before to how much I earn because I want to have the currency left at the end of the month to buy the delegation again without having to keep putting in USD. That changes how I experience the platform in a negative way. But I'm able to really reward a lot of people in significant ways, and this has been wonderful, so it may be worth it in the end. If only we were just all rich!

Ironically enough, I voted a penny on two comments in this thread - I'm still in that trigger happy vote mode where I think a vote is equal to a thumbs up on the other social media platform. It isn't, and this isn't Fascistbook I have to continuously remind myself. It's difficult at times to control the enthusiasm and wanting to see people receive good rewards for their efforts on Steemit.

I am going to look into using Minnowbooster and try to figure this whole thing out with buying delegated SP and as I mentioned on another post, I love How To posts so I'm sure if I dig long enough I'll find some sort of direction. I'll check out the person whom you mentioned above, also.

I'm happy you took the time to respond to my comment as it reassured me that there are people out there who are willing to help the small accounts through advice, upvoting and just taking a little time out of their day to speak!

In my opinion, you are taking the right approach. Don't worry about the reputation as currently it is meaningless since you can buy it with bidbots. Through good comments, in time, you will meet some great people at the very least if not more engagement and votes.

I am honestly making an effort. I take the time to read posts that catch my attention, which usually stems from the headline or title - photos don't truly capture my interests so you won't find me scrolling through the photography tags, to each their own, though. For me, it's about quality writing, building community, getting to know people, reading material that honestly interests me and connecting. I thank you for sharing something today that I could comment on and not feel I was faking engagement, which I think a lot of people do when they spam others - these people don't honestly care for the time and effort it takes to write a post, format it and put it out there for others to enjoy. If they did in fact care, it would be more interaction and less about upvotes and follows. You're probably right on the notion that I shouldn't worry too much about the reputation score at the present, I should focus on what I'm currently doing with reaching out to those who share content I truly like. Thanks for reminding me.

Once you find your groove (and decent follows) you will have plenty to read.
One trick you might like:

https://steemit.com/@tarazkp/feed

That is my feed so you can see what I see. All you need to do is replace my account name with any other account and you can view their feed. It is an easy way to avoid having to go through new or trending to find people. Also, in the comments section you will find the people who will engage well. interact with them, not just the author.

I thank you for this suggestion, and I will use it. I find that the new and trending pages really don't give me the substance I'm looking for, so I can definitely use this insight. It makes life a lot easier than scrolling through dozens of posts before I find something I think is a worth ten to fifteen minutes of reading, then the additional three to five minutes responding to content. I'll definitely continue to make the effort to read through the comment section as I've found most of my payout has come from commenting rather than my blogs. I look forward to reading more from you in the near future! Thanks for the insight and for the responses.

i have to agree with you that you are taking the right approach...
and if you keep it up you will receive more and more upvotes
then do not power down and you will be able to give those 0,02 upvotes yourself...

It takes a little bit of time but, I think it is worth it. Also, if the price of Steem goes up, so does the vote value.

Thanks, felander. I'm doing what it takes to put my best foot forward on the platform. I'm not sure I have enough right now to buy delegated SP but making the effort to communicate with others will get me further ahead as time goes along. I haven't powered down since I discovered the process of powering up.

hehe, now to figure out what you will do with your liquid SBD... go down the vote/bid bot rabbithole or exchange for SP and power up as well

I think it would probably be best to exchange for SP. Trying to figure it out, since I believe I've forgotten how!

go to wallet, click on the little arrow next to the SBD amount and then click on market

there you sell your sbd and the steem will end up in your wallet and you can power up as normal

Yeah when I learned about this dust threshold, it changed my comment - voting behavior. My vote is only worth .01 at 80-100% VP, so I am no longer using it where I'm likely to be the only voter. I now focus on bolstering other 1 - cent votes, or voting on the main article.
Nice to see how you laid it out here, that validates what I'm trying to do.

I think it is a decent way unless the comment really does deserve some encouragement as it can also encourage more voters.

Hi there, thank you for sharing this info with us all. Im very new here and just a little over a week old. I just seen that we can upvote our own blogs 😮 i had no clue, i didnt understand why we would even want to upvote our selves . But then someone explained that if we have the extra power and no time building it up that it doesnt hurt to use it. ?? Idk im still trying to wrap my mind around this whole site . Reading and learning seams to be key here and of course lots of time to spend..
So reading and trying to understand your .01 cents to .19 cents doesnt payout ? But .02 cents will?
And im a bit lost on if you have higher value your power percentage goes lower? Like ok my 20% gives i believe .2 cents but your saying that if the value of the account goes higher then you have to give 80% to get .2 cents on a vote? Im so lost or maybe i got it wrong lol

I've been seeing this topic make the rounds since after Tim's post came out. It's sad that we have to take measures like that to combat the spam. I would think that the energy might be better spent at the Steemit level to stop approving spam accounts. For some reason I keep seeing posts about how the spammers will get hundreds of accounts approved in a short period of time, yet we still have a wait for legit people. I would think that stopping that faucet would be the place to start.

Regardless, it's commendable that you're actively trying to boost worthy posts and comments that are still below the threshold. That's how those people will get their start.

I would think that the energy might be better spent at the Steemit level to stop approving spam accounts.

Yes, that is another interesting issue.

That's how those people will get their start.

I hope :)

I noticed this 'dust threshold' thing but rarely paid attention to it.

I agree (yea, I used that) with everything, little things that seem negligible actually matter to us, the minnows.

I like 'guys' that make it a 'duty' to add value to the blockchain, by providing info and support to the minnows. And the least a minnow can do is to add quality contents to the blockchain, rewards eventually come with that.

It is also nice to know my one cent can determine someone that is deserving get paid.

It is also nice to know my one cent can determine someone that is deserving get paid.

It can influence a lot, especially a person's mood.

Well, it is certainly interesting to find out a bit more about upvoting. Thanks for the information. This will surely make me a wiser upvoter.

I didn't know that.. Basically i didn't know much about steemit yet, im still learning and this one is really helpful. Thanks for sharing your knowledge!

I just re-steemed this post. I think it is very important info to get out, especially for the noobies and people with small amounts of steam power (minnows - I don't really like that term a it makes steemit very class oriented).

Wow thanks I had no idea!! I just did a post with LOTS of steemit advice for newbs, but I can still update it with a link to this one. Good to know...I had no idea I was just throwing away lots of .01 votes a few of months ago when I started. Thanks for sharing so we can know!

no worries. I didn't know until last week either :)

From this, I see that the only way to make other people's good content post earn redeemable rewards is to give them our votes. Though little, it doesn't matter cause bit by bit the drum gets filled up

Yes. That is correct which means, engaging.

Waow thanks @tarazkp for letting us understand the concept of the dust amount, if i get you right, you said 0.001 - 0.019 has no payouts?, i guess i have not come across these before

seems so.

You know before now I must honestly say I don’t know this under 0.2 no pay out policy and I do upvote myself and which you’ve made me understand it’s not worth it and so I’m taking to correction right away. You made me understand so many other things and which I’m glad I’m opportuned to see this post .{ Merci boucoup mon ami. Thanks so much in French} keep steeming and touching lives

0.02 - 2 cents. 0.2 is 20 cents. But yes, you are likely to actually get more votes if you don't vote on yourself and instead vote on other good comments.

Oh yeah thanks, I’d take note of that and put it into action

Well that took the winds right out of my sails. I (being a red fish) was pretty excited to see that my account value went over hundred dollars this weekend.
I also have to admit that I started using steemplus so that I can divide my voting power (steemplus gives you voting power slider option even if you are a minnow or a red fish). The darnedest thing is that even if I upvote with 100% power I still generate 'dust' amounts for my upvote.

yes but, if others vote on top your vote does count. It is only when your vote is the only vote. I know it isn't a great feeling. When I first started here, you needed about a thousand SP to give a 1 cent vote if I remember correctly...

1000 SP for a 1 cent vote? That is crazy.

before the linear voting system came in, it was n2. This meant that the more SP, the higher the vote weight would be. Small accounts were worth nothing and there was actually no reward on comments possible, only posts.

Reintroduced, that would bring the growth of the platform to a halt. n2 is not the only choice. The curve could be any shape we want. It could even adjust automatically to optimize any parameter we like.

That is pretty crazy. I have only been around for about 4 months now so i never got in on any of that. It seems like that setup would have been way more bid bot friendly than the current system.

I have about 2400 SP now (1000 delegated + 1400 of my own) and my vote has a maximum worth of about $0.5 now.

Dang, that means I still have a long way to go.

Hi Taraz. Didn't know this and not that my vote holds any value yet will always do a 100 percent. Only problem is you start dropping in value and power rather quickly. Will keep an eye out for the dust votes and add my vote where I can. What happens to all those non paid out votes? Must add up to quite a bit over a period of time.

I think it just stays in the pool. I have always told people to use their vote even if it doesn't have much value because it is encouraging. I still believe that. I think this affects the self voters more who think they are gtting something for it.

It doesn't pay to self vote when you have no value. Just shows you. Try and use my votes every day. Wish I had more.

I had a bit of a chuckle at the terminology, "dust amounts". For me posting in the comments is a fun activity. I saw a comment today asking for help because they where new, almost pleading for an upvote. Their reputation number was very low, I wondered if they knew what that little number was and that it was likely someone was down voting them. Poor fella I thought. I do appreciate your post, it does make me want to provide better comments. I benefit by getting the word jam out of my fingertips!

They likely know or it is a bot. some set some auto comments that rotate and spam. All kinds appear here :)

Lovely information! I didn’t know about dust amounts until now. I always wondered why figures as such were not paid out. Now I have a better understanding

I applaud your idea to help smaller accounts with good posts/comments to reach the $0.02 threshold. I think I'll follow suit, emphasize it more, mainly because most of what I see from folks are on the lower accounts' posts.

It really is sad to see even those small amounts evaporate into nothing all for the sake of the computational load on the blockchain. Makes me wonder what that means when the flood gates are opened with Velocity. If it is an issue of computation, wouldn't more people on the blockchain cause event a greater problem?

What I'm not sure about, though, is where does the dust go? It may have been in Tim Cliff's post, but I don't remember seeing it. If it gets burned or returned to the reward pool, I guess that's okay. Otherwise, it would be nice to know where it does go.

Someone left a comment on another blog post saying the dust lined the pockets of Steem Inc. It sounded a little facetious, but it did make me wonder.

I believe that while .019 won't payout, it also isn't discarded. So, if you get such a vote on a comment, and then get another on a different comment, together they will add up to a payout. This is my understanding on how dust votes work. They never expire, but are accumulated until there are enough for a payout.

Suggestion, don't pay out any posts that make more than 1SBD.

Te comento dos cositas: la primera es que me pareció aparte de interesante muy completa tu información, hay cosas de la plataforma que aun muchos de los que estamos aquí no conocemos, en mi caso lo digo por mi y la segunda es que te felicito porque la verdad es interesante aprender de los que ya tienen mas conocimientos como tu por ejemplo te envio saludos y te invito a seguir compartiendo información como estas completas y con mucha sabiduría saludos.

I commented two things: the first is that I found it very interesting apart your information, there are things on the platform that even many of us here do not know, in my case I say it for me and the second is that I congratulate you because the truth is interesting to learn from those who already have more knowledge as you for example I send greetings and I invite you to continue sharing information as you are complete and very wisely greetings

curious why newbies arent told this from the beginning? might be discouraging for some, and they dont stay. what a pointless rule... it took me several weeks, over a month, actually, to finally get to 100 percent. the only way to get to 100 percent is to not engage or vote whatsoever for about three days. If I had known about this burn rule, Id have waited for 100 percent voting power since the start, so that my vote actually mattered.

You have been upvoted by @black-man because I found your content useful. I run the Yensesa.com project @yensesa , which is the first Ghanaian Steem/SBD to fiat exchange in Ghana using mobile money. We also use our steem delegations to support and promote quality post of new members.

== You can delegate to help us promote Steem and support new members ==

REPLACE username with your username (no @ symbol)

50 SP = 103470.397100

https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/delegateVestingShares?delegator=username&delegatee=yensesa&vesting_shares=103470.397100%20VESTS

100 SP = 206940.794200

https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/delegateVestingShares?delegator=username&delegatee=yensesa&vesting_shares=206940.794200%20VESTS

250 SP = 517351.985500

https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/delegateVestingShares?delegator=username&delegatee=yensesa&vesting_shares=517351.985500%20VESTS

500 SP = 1034703.971000

https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/delegateVestingShares?delegator=username&delegatee=yensesa&vesting_shares=1034703.971000%20VESTS

1000 SP = 2069407.942000

https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/delegateVestingShares?delegator=username&delegatee=yensesa&vesting_shares=2069407.942000%20VESTS

Steemit has quite a lot of opportunity for so many out there. They don’t go around copy/pasting spam asking for delegations. They put in many hard days’ worth of work to create a foundation and build from there.

You build community around a product by outreaching to those in a meaningfully manner. Not by doing this in irrelevant places. This only harms a products reputation and is a horrible way to introduce yourself to someone on steemit.

If you are in need to earn some money to get by due to struggles in your region I strongly recommend having meaningfully and engaging comments with people. Enter into contest. Find communities that are relevant to you and find a way to be useful to them.

Noted, thanks for your feedback.

This is not really a great way to go in my opinion. it is spam insensitive to the content and the speed at which you are posting it means you are not reading the posts. I would normally flag it but, I will give a chance to change it to something relevant first.

What a great response! Even if you hadn’t flagged him, you could’ve ignored him. But by taking time to comment, you’re helping him improve himself. You’re also setting an example for others who see this.

Having lived in many cultures, what’s appropriate in one setting is completely inappropriate in another. Sometimes (not all the time) I think this is a problem on Steemit. Most of the users are Western, so it can be difficult for other cultures to understand the etiquette especially in an online setting.

Thanks for setting a great example!

Thanks for your feedback. Noted.