We will be so connected in the future that we won't need to leave our houses and we will work from home, while robots will do the hard work. We will focus more and more on the regenerated energy and our technology will be more focused to save power. But we will need more people (that will work in non-services industry) if we want to have that kind of life. So what do we have to do to achieve this goal?
Wars can be a solution, but how can we do that, when there is not an equal force, that can be really strong enough in the world? Right now we have 3 main powers: Nato/Russia/China. Even if both Russia and China make a coalition, their budget will be less than half of how much USA alone have. And let's be clear, in NATO are over 28 member states. So fighting each other directly is not an option. They need a common enemy, where they can test their armaments and show their strength.
Every day we see new enemies. Is it that with billions of dollars and coalitions of the most powerful leaders of the world, we still can't solve the problem? It happens because we probably don't want to or we need that problem. But who is winning in this equation? USA and Russia are fighting each other over Syria and Europe pay the bills. So maybe war can be a solution for the moment, or at least that's how they consider.
Maybe we didn't see the bigger picture and maybe something is missing here. EU(European Union) have over 500 mil in population and, in addition, has a stagnation in population growth. And they can't handle 600.000 immigrants? While Turkey with 80 mil received 2.8 mil immigrants and a big check of money from EU (6 billions € )
Let's go deeper into the subject. Syria has only 23 millions in population and 2.8 millions stopped in Turkey, that means Europe pays 2142 euros for each Syrian that stays in their country. To pay rent and eat in Turkey costs a person around 453 euro, so Europe pays Turkey for 5 months, but we all know that the immigrants don't rent apartments and live on tends and also many of them are ready to work and are skilled people that don't beg for daily food.
So if I'm right, for the moment, we won't see other comments about the immigrants for the next 8-12 months. After that, I believe that Turkey will open again the route to EU for the next immigrant infusion because, even if we didn't know we needed those people, they will help to rejuvenate the EU. 15% population between 0-14 age and 18% over 64 age are not good numbers and eurostats indicates that, at this rate, the EU population will increase with only by 4% in the next 64 years, until 2080.
I know behind the scene someone is cooking something and I think the Syrian situation was cooked for EU.
We will see in our lifetime many changes, this will not be the world that my grandchildren will see and live. For sure in the next years we will have a more united EU with a stronger Germany.
Also, China will be more active in the military operations and a dominant economy, as they will continue to buy country debts (the largest acquisition was on US debt 1.2 trillion that are equal to 8% of the total of US debt) and conquer the sky. They have an independent spatial program and they made a lot of progress in the latest years.
US will be more and more focused on services and exporting only the blueprint. In the next 60 years, the population will grow by near 25% and the demand of the goods will be really high. This will give them the status of the biggest food importer and will overpass the EU.
How do you think the world will be?
and anyway, if i focus on Syrian war, Turkey played key role. It's not only USA.
yeah, I think Turkey has a big role. In Syria there are over 2mil kurds so they have a main interest in this war. Also, I think the coup d'etat was architected by Erdogan to consolidate his power.
YES, yes, yes. I already like you :D the coup d'etat was definitely organized by Erdogan. While country was a mess and military was on the road, i am quite sure Erdogan had enough time to destroy any evidence that he had with ISIS ( he bought their oil, thus funding ISIS operation. ISIS main money come from selling oil)
A common enemy? That is such a stone age mentality. If we absolutely need one here is a suggestion : human stupidity. And the most striking example of human stupidity is war. Because it is an event where one side will end up losing their life way before the time , while the other side becomes a murderer. Not exactly a win - win solution.
I think we can end all wars , forever , and never look back.
Instead we simply create a global super-society where every person without exception wins and there is no need any more for enemies anywhere. Instead we can simply live life to its fullest. Loving every second of it.
The one who has a solution to that my friend, that person has it all.
Unfortunately, just like here on Steemit, you cannot have people believe in something and others believe in something else and expect them to all get along. There are many wars started on religious beliefs. Good luck making those parties stop fighting ;)
Why should that be a problem? Of course people believe different things since we have different experiences and information and personalities. This only makes life more interesting. It makes it possible to learn new things from each other and expand the perspecives. Even people with very strong religious beliefs should be able to admit that they dont know everything there is no know. The parties should stop fighting as long as the fighting is in none of the parties interests. If they believe different things a better option than fighting is learning from the differences.
Well that's the thing. Some of the parties interests are cataloging the non-party people as enemies and demands action against them. This is the reality friend, let's not beat around the bush with it. There's no way to live 100% in peace atm. Don't even get me started on financial interests and puppeteers. On this last one, hopefully Steem will have a strong say.
Yes this issue with the parties and non-parties is a good point. No doubt it is reality. And yet it seems totally artificial since "party" is just an abstraction. Same with the political parties : abstract entities. Not that abstract entities need to be problematic. But when they are the kind of abstract entities which define themselves in opposition to other abstract entities, then I think they are quite useless. Kind of like the separation between "left" and "right" in politics seems useless. It is like this way of thinking which creates artificial conflicts out of thin air. And when people begin to identify with those kind of concepts the artificial abstract conflict suddenly turns into a real psychological conflict between people. People who may have been friends if they had not viewed each other through these artificial conflict-enhancing frames.
When it comes to financial interests and puppeteers this is obviously a complex issue. It seems related to a wish to control resources. However if we had a system where resources could be used superefficiently then maybe many of these problems could be sidestepped. And yes I really think the concept of steem can bring something useful to this. It will be interesting to see what way it will evolve. I do see the potential for a new economic model hidden here.
1 in 5 people are illiterate, so this is the "stone age", even if we don't want to recognize it. Yeah, war is the most stupid instrument that the mankind use. "Hard time create strong men, strong men create good times. Good times create weak men, weak men create hard time." The problem is that we are not really connected with each nation, each culture live a different time. Maybe one day we will be on the same page.
The reality of the situation in this world is not at all different from the classic good v. bad, light v. dark tales of the past. These are not tales—it is the very nature of this world, and we are living the struggle right now! It is actually a spiritual battle for the future of this planet, and economics is being used as a weapon of mass destruction, to destroy the ability of the people to respond.
Nice post Sitaru
Hello @sitaru, this a good post. Please make sure your photos are copyrights free (the old man photo is not).
thanks for the comment, all photos were taken from google search and i selected images free to use. anyway here's the source of the old man :) "
"
when u reverse check . Not all photos that you find in Wikipedia are royalty free. :)
suggestions for royalty free photos: pixabay.com , pexels.com, search.creativecommons.org. When you google images make sure you you click on "labeled for reuse".
P.S: i have no intention to ruin the post. if you change the photos, i would like to promote it :)
Ok. I edited it, I added the links.
nice post. world peace.
great post, nonetheless domination is work done by the new world order people