a non-profit bid bot and now I'm trying to enforce the EIP that came with the hardfork yes, it's getting pretty annoying though with all the retaliation and people thinking they know better without knowing much by their fast judgements
Because compared to other for profit bid bots that you use it was doing the least damage to the currency you are funding your "charity" with. Not gonna bother replying to you anymore, we are downvoting most people using bid bots, just because you maybe aren't taking a cut for yourself doesn't mean it's not unfair to everyone not using bid bots or delegating to them but curating instead.
You're ignoring the EIP, if people thought it was a worthy cause they would upvote it more without you having to buy votes which undermines the EIP, no?
Btw most charities are scams so unless made absolutely clear how every steem is spent I consider anything labeled charity a cover for someone to middleman profit off of it.
ignoring the fact that the upvote was bought by someone else.
No I checked that most votes were bought by this user who seems to mainly resteem your content so it being "someone else" is hard to believe but if it really is then tell him to donate directly instead of enriching bid bot owners and their delegators so you can get a profitable vote which takes from everyone else not buying votes and not delegating to bid bots. If you still have trouble understanding the economics here and how free money can't just appear without someone else losing out on it when the reward pool is limited than you're either delusional or just don't care and want to be right and make our downvoting which we get nothing out of except retaliation downvotes and this bullshit drama then I'm done trying to explain anything further to you.
a non-profit bid bot and now I'm trying to enforce the EIP that came with the hardfork yes, it's getting pretty annoying though with all the retaliation and people thinking they know better without knowing much by their fast judgements
Because compared to other for profit bid bots that you use it was doing the least damage to the currency you are funding your "charity" with. Not gonna bother replying to you anymore, we are downvoting most people using bid bots, just because you maybe aren't taking a cut for yourself doesn't mean it's not unfair to everyone not using bid bots or delegating to them but curating instead.
Tschüss
You're ignoring the EIP, if people thought it was a worthy cause they would upvote it more without you having to buy votes which undermines the EIP, no?
Btw most charities are scams so unless made absolutely clear how every steem is spent I consider anything labeled charity a cover for someone to middleman profit off of it.
It would be downvoted as well, thanks for accusing me of taking sides.
No I checked that most votes were bought by this user who seems to mainly resteem your content so it being "someone else" is hard to believe but if it really is then tell him to donate directly instead of enriching bid bot owners and their delegators so you can get a profitable vote which takes from everyone else not buying votes and not delegating to bid bots. If you still have trouble understanding the economics here and how free money can't just appear without someone else losing out on it when the reward pool is limited than you're either delusional or just don't care and want to be right and make our downvoting which we get nothing out of except retaliation downvotes and this bullshit drama then I'm done trying to explain anything further to you.
https://steemit.com/@sabih
What are we supposed to downvote from the owner?