Several girls from all over Italy came in contact with a man via the social network. With him, they went into a distance relationship, without ever having met with him. But when they learned the truth, their mouths remained open.
He did not blackmail them with footage. On the contrary, he sent them gifts. And that's sweet. They never got the chance to get to know their mysterious man.
Jolen Branko, under this name, someone corresponded with them, had a completely credible profile at first glance, and a lot of photos on it. It's a pity that all these photos were not his, but he stole them from another man, Giuliano Rauci. "A nice boy, potent, very emotional and gentle," he was described by the women who were writing to him. "He was very attentive and sweet, they talked on the phone for hours. He knew what a woman wants to hear. It was not hard to fall in love. "Jolen gained confidence by telling tragic family stories, showing empathy.
Some of them, divorced and with children, practically accepted him in the family, some of them even introduced him to their parents. But even after many months of distant communication, no one was able to reach him in person. Every time he made a new tragic excuse.
Investigative reporters in the Le Yen broadcast contacted Giuliana, who revealed who was hideing all this time behind his profile: Angelica, a girl, a customer from his store. Angelica then confessed everything. She performed all the calls with a 'robotic voice' using an application that turned her voice into a mans. As she explained, she did this out of dissatisfaction with her life, and because at least in Platonic way women attracted her.
Nevertheless, some have expressed doubts that the story in the background is real. Was there more than that in the background? Italian leader Selvaggia Lucarelli is convinced that it was. As she says, she finds it impossible for girls to talk to a 'robot' for many years. Two of the girls allowed to play the recordings of conversations, and it is believed that this voice was not robotically changed, but that it was a normal young man's voice. In addition, she finds it unusual for Angelica to do this, since the mysterious woman could talk days and nights, and Angelica was married, which would mean that the husband should practically be absent all day and night. "It must be someone who either does not have a job or has too much free time," she wrote on Facebook. "Someone who lives alone or with a roommate. He has a roman accent and is young. Angelica pretended to be Jolen's sister. It's hard to use the app so it's been heard that girls talk to Jolly and sister at the same time. "
The girls were honest in the talks, they trusted their stories. Jolen always found some tragic excuse that he could not meet with them. Or his uncle die, or he had a video camera destroyed ... One day, one of the girls asked him to take a shot, as she says "Ciao, Sara" and has a specific song for the basis. Two days later, she got such an image of Giuliana. Is Jolen on? The video looks authentic, the voice is the same as the phone. Comment Giuliana? "The video is stolen, I call it" Ciao, Mara "or" Ciao Chiara. "" I do not seem to remember well.
"It's clear that no one has done anything bad for this. And some girls are psychologically destroyed. Jolen talked with their children, bought them toy cars, promised love, weddings, presence. Were the promises honest? Jolen caught three sensitive women. One is even disabled. Perhaps it was a game, but the place of identity is punishable, "added Lucarelli. "This story is not over yet."
Special thanks and support to: @hr1 , @bue , @welcoming , @surpassinggoogle , @gaman , @minnowpond , @trevonjb , @jerrybanfield , @craig-grant , @knozaki2015 , @gavvet , @papa-pepper , @curie , @stellabelle , @sweetsssj , @kevinwong , @kingscrown , @officialfuzzy , @steemtrail , @kaylinart . Keep up the great work, without you Steemit would not be the same.
Haha.. really! I think it could definitely be Angelica. If it was a man, I see no reason why he would refuse to meet with the ladies even if the photo was not his.
i agree ;)
If that's true it will be a fact, and never stop😊
Very interesting
thanks