Expensive Drugs Rant!

in #inleo20 hours ago

The diabetes drug Mounjaro could be made available on the NHS. It's been used with diabetes patients thus far, but it could be rolled out to obese people more generally.

Mounjaro is an appetite suppressant that's been found to help patients lose up to 25% of their weight in one year...

Screenshot 2024-10-27 at 12.46.01.png

The problem is we just don't know whether the drug is clinically effective.

Yes, it has been shown to have positive effectives in reducing weight and blood pressure, but that's no proof it is actually doing patients any good.

The NHS is proposing to roll-out weight loss jabs to thousands at first, but over the next 12 years it could offer these to thousands of people. Initially to those with a BMI of 40 or more and multiple chronic health conditions.

It has show it can help people lose 26% of their body weight in 18 months if they inject weekly.

Costs...

NB the initial cost is TERRIFYING... £150 per patient per month, and while that's not THAT high compared to some drugs, the TERRIFYING thing here is that it sounds affordable per person, but if it were given to EVERYONE that needed it with that 40 BMI score, that would mean £1.6 billion a year. (Source).

But then the estimated annual cost of obesity to the NHS is quadruple that figure at nearly £7BN. (Source).

Talk about unskilful action...

So when we are talking about obesity of this magnitude, it's not just people who have genetic conditions, inactive thyroids or whatever, no, this is mainly just people eating too much for whatever reasons, probably not helped by social pressures such as poverty and stress and then easily available junk food.

So we have a society in which the shit sinks to the bottom and people stress-eat and get fat, then we pay a drug company to sort them out (or at least have a punt at sorting them out), but will it...?

I mean maybe this drug will make people less hungry (BTW nausea and constipation are side effects, so it ain't necessarily gonna be pleasant!) but once they come off it, if their circumstances haven't changed surely they'll just get fat again, a lot of them...?

Surely What we really need to tackle obesity is a public health approach - to combat the health harms that fast food, alcohol and tobacco do to so many people in our society.

Posted Using InLeo Alpha

Sort:  

Easily available, cheap and calorie dense foods and drinks sold in large package or portion sizes make a huge difference. It's been shown that people have a strong tendency to finish their meals instead of leaving any on the plate regardless of portion size and feeling about equally satisfied. The marketing and sales of such items should be limited somewhat similarly to how some countries limit the sales and marketing of alcohol. Non-walkable communities and a lack of bicycle lanes or paths make a big difference, too. Perhaps it would make sense to put tax incentives in place for employers to provide gym memberships and the like as fringe benefits.

Any low-calorie but nutrient dense foods that the human body has difficulty getting calories out of such as high-fibre fruits should have lower VAT at the expense of unhealthy alternatives. Nutrition information should be provided to the public more readily than it already is.

What we really need to tackle obesity is a public health approach - to combat the health harms that fast food, alcohol and tobacco do to so many people in our society.

This sums it. Although these newer drugs can help a lot of people to start following the right path, without working on the base problems I have the same opinion as you... vast majority will just return to baseline.

I wonder what would happen if that £150 was given directly to people for their food budget along with access to a health trainer (although they'd have to be called something else, the health trainer model has been discredited).