Yours is a position of infinite need

I disagree and see no evidence for that. You are welcome to provide some.

You need people to believe the way that you do.

No, I don't. Actually I have written extensively on the need to dispose of all beliefs.

You need the social truth of 'denial' to mean what you say it is.

Again, no - denial has nothing to do with opinion or preference. Anything, pretty much can be denied and it is pretty much the dictionary definition I am using.

1520s, "refusal to grant what is requested or desired;" see deny + -al (2). Replaced earlier denyance (late 15c.). Sense of "act of asserting to the contrary, contradicting" is from 1570s; that of "refusal to accept or acknowledge" is from 1580s. In some 19c. uses, it really means "self-denial." Meaning "unconscious suppression of painful or embarrassing feelings" first attested 1914 in A.A. Brill's translation of Freud's "Psychopathology of Everyday Life"; hence the phrase in denial, popularized 1980s.


You need gods truth to mean your truth to maintain a superior claim of morality.

Again, no - you are judging here 100%. I actually understand that every human is a piece of God. I also understand that all is one.

There are positions that see people as they are, that don't require vast amounts if social need/engineering as a starting point.

My position began there.

You have listed several needs which you claim are mine, but which I know are not. Even if you were correct about them, that is still only several needs and certainly not anywhere near an infinite number of needs. I am not sure exactly how you thought that guessing/projecting/creating some needs would respond to my call for evidence of infinite needs anyway, since infinite literally means 'never ends' - so you would literally need to just keep writing new needs for the rest of your life to even come close to providing evidence of your claim.