this is quite a nice statistical trick, to show the number of mortal cases instead of the number of infections. Because of course, medical treatment quality- and also the availability of medical treatment for the masses - increased a lot after WW2. Thus, a lot less people died of those infective deseases.
But that doesn't mean that vaccinations don't help to stop the desease! As you can see here, the rate of new infections goes down significantly after 1963 in the US:
https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/graph-us-measles-cases
This demonstrates that a rotavirus vaccination is 94% effective in the prevention of rotavirus infection.
Yes, you use legit sources, thank you very much for this! But reading scientific sources is another skill that people have to learn and throwing graphs out there without fully understanding them is just as bad as not using right sources. Here is another article that shows what happens if you do not vaccinate:
Yes, some people are allergic to vaccinations. But again, the statistics show that most people have no problems with vaccinations. And in our modern society, where everybody is spending most their time in clean buildings, it is important to vaccinate. Because we do not have the same exposure to germs in our youth as we used to. Thus our immune systems are getting worse (thus we have increased rates of asthma and allergies).
I have no intention to insult anybody. There is enough evidence out there. Use google scholar and search for yourself. Do not just listen to one guy trying to sell you something but educate yourself. Cheers!I totally agree with @sco, who, by the way, is a toxicologist. It is fair to say that vaccinations are not perfect. But nothing really is. There are thousands of peer-reviewed research articles out there that demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of vaccinations. Here is one recent study: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309914708321#bbib7 http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/en/