One of the main goal of the open source world is to give project users the chance to contribute to the project they love. Even before the birth of Utopian.io, open source exists and people have been contributing to it free without prioritising the "reward." Although the reward sometimes motivate people to contribute to one's project. Utopian serve as a gate way to empower (not "pay") these contributors by rewarding them for their quality effort. If you truely love and appreciate the term open source, you would not even care about the reward. I understand that utopian reward is one of the key factor that motivates some users to contribute but we've mentioned it many times that these rewards are not guaranteed. There wont be hard feelings if the reason why you contribute is not soley tied to the reward.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I suggest saying 'Rewards are guaranteed for most of good contributions' instead!
why we are delegating sp to the utopian? we want to reward contributors
Then it seems the "rewards aren't guaranteed" policy isn't broadcasted enough.
Users who assume they'll receive them, even if they would've contributed regardless will feel cheated.
It's not a good feeling to have if you want them using utopian V2.
It's actually a terrible policy to have if you want them to use Utopian V2.
I hope you change it, because it seriously lowers your chances of becoming profitable.