I think 10% is quite reasonable and I'm sure others do too but I am getting some people making a big deal about the 10% is there a way you can explain in a post what the 10% is going towards?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think 10% is quite reasonable and I'm sure others do too but I am getting some people making a big deal about the 10% is there a way you can explain in a post what the 10% is going towards?
This is our payout for @algo.coder and I, for development and service maintenance. We set it to 5% each, but it may evolve if many people use the service (we also talked about 2.5% each and 5% for @steemigram). We just wait to see how the service will be used.
The latter might be ideal if you power that up and reward people and add curation. For instance I am apart of @steembasicincome and I will be giving you my post payouts which will include that. So if you are taking rewards and having at least 5% going to the account empowering that up and then adding curation to the users that would be really ideal and cool
That's an option. It's not fully decided yet, but once again, rewarding users of the service is something we really want to do.
It's aimed at covering the server's costs but also paying us for the time spent on the project (development, maintenance, promotion, ...).As said by @sebbbl, it's the cut we have set for now.
It may (and surely will) evolve with time and the use of the service. We may also put a part of this fee directly on the @steemigram account to increase Steem Power and the value of the upvotes that will be given to the users (Curation is not up yet, but it's only a matter of a day or two).
In the event that the service is widely used, this percentage may decrease, but for now it's really just there to try and cover the fixed costs of such a project.
Thank you I'm really excited something like this should have been done for YouTube instead of dtube which is isolating for most and not fully functional
thanks for tuning me into this @dynamicgreentk !!!!!!!!!!!!!!