You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: RESTEEMING BOTS - Are those bots better or worse than upvoting bots? (Attached: full list of resteeming bots on Steemit).

in #steemit • 6 years ago

hi @hatu

Thank for your your kind comment bud.

I'll have to disagree bud.
They do not provide an audience that likes your content
Plus, just think about it, who actually follows back when some one follows them?

Perhaps I didn't make myself clear. I never care about amount of new followers. I care about number of comments coming from new human accounts.

Having post in trending page is bringing worse results than using resteeming bots. That's my impression. Obviously both methods are not really great. But one is better than the other.

At the end of the day both methods are being used by many people and whenever I used 10-15 SBD on resteeming bots - I would get comments from 5-15 users I've never knew before. So result was okey.

Again thx for your comment mate :)


thx guys for dropping by :)@conceptskip @techstack

Yours
Piotr

6 years ago in #steemit by
$0.00
    Reply 2
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago  

    What about comment quality?

    When I mentioned the follow4follow, I was referring to how those bots get their followers--those are impulse-based follows, generally providing little follow-up results. Concluding, the comment quality is likely very low.

    Here's the thing: anyone can use these services due to their low cost barrier; so they can be easily flooded with weak content. So, if a few value-adding users manage to be those bots' audience, they'd soon unfollow after noticing that those bots do not curate.

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       6 years ago  

      I love to see how responsive you are @hatu

      Thank you again for taking time to reply.

      Yours, Piotr

      $0.00
        Reply