There is no "size" of village. It is like directories so anyone choose to post any village. Intentional attack is only valid when 51% stakes are held by evil users. If there is an intentional attack, also will be defensive upvote(on village) too.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thanks. There is no size of village but size can make sense when it comes to the number of user posting to the village. So it is still not very clear to me that how this model prevents majority of people from downvoting the villeages created by minorities. Think about a village created for LGBT. How could they save their village from being downvoted by huge number of haters? What would happen if users of cn village downvote on kr village due to the political issus like THAAD installation? Maybe I am fundamentally misunderstnading your proposal.
It is matter of rewards, not of freedom of speech. And if there is more stakes supporting a certain village, poats in the village can get rewarded. Be advised that a village is not a group of people(and your misunderstanding maybe about this point). People can post everywhere until blacklisted.
ok, I am getting closer. still miles away though... :) thanks!