Except that the Whale experiment was an overwhelming success.. But what do I know, I only witnessed the crowd chher it on and it was completely about money.
Posted using Partiko Android
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Except that the Whale experiment was an overwhelming success.. But what do I know, I only witnessed the crowd chher it on and it was completely about money.
Posted using Partiko Android
The whale experiment was completely different. It was 2 whales capping influence at X vests. Any vote that was cast that was higher than that amount was countered (negated) with a downvote. It had nothing to do with quality. It was simply removing the largest votes so everyone else's votes had more influence.
The whale experiment you refer to achieved exactly the purpose of the Huey Long algorithm I have proposed: limiting the profiteering potential of perverting curation via financial manipulation.
The only differences were that the algorithm was different, and it wasn't cast in code, but done by altruists. It didn't last because it wasn't cast in code as the Huey Long algorithm would be. No downvotes would be necessary from the Huey Long algorithm to achieve the same purpose.
I flag trash. You have received a flag.