What is your thoughts on proposal 52?
I'm voting no due to the low fee, imo could cause too much sell pressure.
More info:
https://hive.blog/hive-167922/@rentmoney/just-say-no-proposal-52-entering-zing-pool
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm voting yes on it. I'd like to see the fees a bit higher, like 10%, but those selling are going to sell anyway. At least this way, 5% of their total sell is burned. As long as they give us a locking mechanism, I'm for proposal 52.
Looks like 1.25% is what is purposed. Seems as they got the 5% number by multiplying 1.25 x 4. The four being the current amount of weeks ti takes to unstake but applying 1.25 over 4 weeks is still charging a 1.25 fee not a 5% fee. Which for me is too low of a fee to create sell pressure. I might of voted yes if it was 5% across the board. Thanks for the response.
!PIZZA
!BEER
!PGM
BUY AND STAKE THE PGM TO SEND A LOT OF TOKENS!
The tokens that the command sends are: 0.1 PGM-0.1 LVL-0.1 THGAMING-0.05 DEC-15 SBT-1 STARBITS-[0.00000001 BTC (SWAP.BTC) only if you have 2500 PGM in stake or more ]
5000 PGM IN STAKE = 2x rewards!
Discord
Support the curation account @ pgm-curator with a delegation 10 HP - 50 HP - 100 HP - 500 HP - 1000 HP
Get potential votes from @ pgm-curator by paying in PGM, here is a guide
I'm a bot, if you want a hand ask @ zottone444