A pyramid is a four-phase vortex who's origin is the apex block.
This would suggest a vortecial path during construction. I would suppose that each block had a strict sequence of motions to traverse else the construction method would be less efficient. Like having too many people working in a small space. An order needs to be implemented for all of the pieces to keep moving without delay.
They could reasonably have had four paths onto the pyramidal construction platform, that is an efficient four-lane blockpath (channels).
..oh, one channel has a bad block in the way. Three can continue operating while the damaged stone is cleared for the next.
Having only one path, were it delayed the Pharoah would need to see the ripe old age of five-hundred.
As the number of levels increases, a path along each of the four sides develops. The path allows the reduction of slope angle decreasing the amount of momentary force required to raise the upper levels.
I would place wet wood on ramp blocks (diagonal cut block, reduction ratio angle) for raising blocks to the level of above.
One human of modest dimensions, can pull 100lbs across a flat surface. 22 humans can pull 2200lbs, one ton.
If I know the weight of one block, we may pass the value to Hiram the Architect. He can divide the weight of one block by the weight one person can move. There is a modulating function that applies the force interaction of slope to the formula .. yielding the number of extra humans required during sloped operations at a given angle.
Built with both kinds of energy, the axis of mental energy and the axis for physical expression of force.
Four vortices are required to declare the corner stones of a pyramid in a more dynamic way. Otherwise they can be declared only in closed rings.
Pyramidal shapes having either a triangle/pentagonal base can be declared using three and five vortices.
GOOD, now we can stop trying to bend space and begin working what is possible.
Some suggest that a vortex might be an elevator to any floor of the universe including those not yet fathomed. Freedom to explore needs to be balanced with what we can do. Within that spectrum are the questions that can be solved given the breadth of knowledge at the base of the collective.
A better solution might mix and form the faux-stone on the pyramid itself. Folk see the construction 4500 years later, "How could ancient Egyptians have moved such large stone?" ..how does the Earth mix and displace stone?
..is it possible that 4500 years make faux-stone the real thing?
The stone is supposed to have been quarried and transported. It is much more logical for humans that possess the technology and materials to make concrete. The faux-stone is mixed, 4500 years do not make it granite. The time is enough for future humans to inspect the stone and conclude the materials contained in the "stone" are the same as those of the quarry.
I would not have people hauling stone, it sounds like a ridiculous construction method for a time when making bigger rocks from little rocks was commonplace technology.
Joints so perfectly fit a sheet of paper will not pass. Hmm... from a logical perspective, it seems more appropriate to propose construction by concrete. The "stone" even contains all of the ingredients to baking a concrete birthday cake for the Pharoah.
Rather than use rebar, us Egyptians can afford to quarry more limestone to harden the "cake".
Honestly I do not know exactly what method the Egyptians employed, this was the way I would proceed if I were tasked with the organization and construction of a Pyramid.
The majority of ecosystems on Earth possess a source of water where sand and clay are also found. Those who had the technology of limestone hardening had experienced a civilization working to produce a lasting impression upon the Earth. The slavery is certainly not to be overlooked. The importance of the achievement for humanity's future generations could not be overstated.
The same is true of steel hardening, eras and empires seem to organize about technologies along the human historical timeline.
There is no cold or wet land about the Pyramids. The faux-stone for the ages is poured in the block form. The sequential mixing and setting ensures that a necessary fault exists between the pourings (blocks).
I have moved a several hundred pound fragment of concrete, with hammer, chisel ..two and three strikes create a weakness, the process is repeated along the prepared faultline. The final motion of the hammer on only one half of the large fragment, separates it in two smaller fragments that one can carry or divide further.
Having a feel for how strong and weak concrete mixtures can be, I think they might very well be mistaken for stone 4500 years later. They also could not mix uniformly with cement mixer. Measurements may have been nearing accurate if we consider the number of armloads and cartloads of this and the other materials going into one block. Is the next block identical, not likely.
I prefer science we can measure over a bright idea that prevents us from understanding because it seems to entertain more efficiently, like the blackhole causing the unnecessary "quantum" label in everything when it can become classical physics.
Place the blackholes where they belong in the cosmos, not at each incalculable instant. As a matter of fact many Quantum Mechanical effects are more than quantized meaning they can be included as predictable mechanisms of our existence.
At the moment there exists more hocus pocus in emerging scientific publications than ever before. We are experiencing a time when we can confirm some of the hocus pocus and do away with the inconsistencies that held back subsequent development.
Tonight our block form is in place. The sands and limestone are piled and prepared on the block level above the pour. The biggest challenge might be the pulley/bucket system carrying water to the work level. A nearby well under the sands or river water diverted by dyke is the key to the project, else there is only sand.
I have moved one ton of dirt with a shovel, more than once. If the blocks are ten tons we need at least ten people shoveling as water is released from the reservoir atop into the mix.
This signifies that world heritage sites yielding samples from large stones need to be included in a list of suspected ancient masonry. The samples which contain limestone graduate to a narrowed list of possible confirmations of ancient masonry. Often documentaries mention the nearby quarries for these ancient "stones". The likelihood of the stones being made from ancient proportions for mixing cement, are increased when considering whether a sample contains limestone. "We cannot seem to accurately date the stones..." ..hmm, a remixing of Earthly ingredients by humans may not contain the information about the origin of the material ..other than they seem to have been quarried from nearby. Our best guess was that humans moved these? ..why?