Katy Perry's Suborbital Soirée: A High-Altitude Vanity Project?

in #opinion7 months ago

So, Katy Perry took a brief detour to the edge of space—well, the suborbital edge—for a whopping 10 minutes. A quick jaunt to the Kármán line and back. And while I hate to sound like a party pooper, I have to agree with the critics: this flight was, frankly, bananas.

From a scientific standpoint, the mission yielded zero new insights. The rocket's successful operation? That's about as groundbreaking as confirming your car starts when you turn the key. In essence, it was a joyride for those with more money than they could spend in a lifetime—unless they tried really, really hard.

Now, if the ultra-wealthy want to splurge on legal extravagances, that's their prerogative. But here's the rub: the environmental cost of this escapade isn't being footed by anyone. Producing the hydrogen fuel likely generated nearly 100 tons of CO₂.

The real issue? These 93 tons of CO₂ emissions consume a portion of our finite carbon budget. Once it's spent on frivolities like this, it's unavailable for more pressing needs. And let's not forget: the super-rich already have an outsized environmental footprint, with their sprawling estates, yachts, and private jets.

What adds insult to injury is the transparent attempt to spin this flight into a content goldmine. It's akin to someone boasting about riding a roller coaster as if they built it themselves. The public saw through it immediately, rendering the PR stunt ineffective and leaving a sour taste.

Perhaps if they had offset the emissions multiple times over—again, mere peanuts for them—and refrained from turning it into a spectacle, the public might have been more forgiving. But as it stands, it seems they weren't genuinely interested in space exploration. The mission's sole purpose was to cross the Kármán line, experience microgravity briefly, and return. It reminds me of those contracts in Kerbal Space Program: "Send a Kerbal to suborbit and back for X funds." So, you cobble together the cheapest rocket possible, launch, and recover—just to make a quick buck.

The only difference? In a video game, you can ignore all the side effects—even if your Kerbal drifts off into the void of space.


Sort:  

First time seeing a post about space here.
This was a nice read, you cut through the hype and showed how wasteful it really was. The Kerbal game reference was funny but so true. Space should be about discovery, not wasting of resources.

Greetings!

So damn true, I wanna see discussions about the ethical implications to settle on Mars like those with Mars One. But no, we get stuff like that. 😭

I understand you. The ethical convo is long overdue. Hopefully more scientists start speaking up about it.

Hey … you don’t like the Holozing Project ? Why the downvotes ?

Loading...