by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
May 5, 2018
Last month, while everyone was distracted by other events, the Japanese government did something rather remarkable: They activated a marine unit. Specifically, the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force activated a 1,500 man unit known as the Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade. The occasion was marked by a ceremony at Sasebo military base on the island of Kyushu.
This may not seem particularly newsworthy. After all, the activation of a single marine brigade would not be a remarkable event in virtually any other nation on the planet. But in Japan, where there has not been such a marine activation since WWII, it is extraordinary.
Well, extraordinary but not unexpected. To anyone who has been paying attention, Japan's definitely-not-an-offensive-military "Self-Defence Force" is, for all intents and purposes, an offensive military in disguise.
For those not in the know, Article 9 of the Japanese post-war constitution explicitly forbids the country from maintaining "land, sea and air forces." Or, in its full context:
"Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes. In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized."That's a pretty bold clause to include in a national constitution. It's also why the average Japanese citizen has come to think of Japan as a peaceful nation since the downfall of the old Imperial Army. But most importantly, it's a giant thorn in the side of those politicians like current Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe who desperately want to re-militarize the nation.
Not that Article 9 has ever really stopped Japan from possessing "land, sea, and air forces," of course. The government just re-branded those forces as "Self-Defense Forces" and said they were exclusively for self-defense and peacekeeping. But riddle me this: If Japan really is a pacifist nation that has forever renounced war, why is it ranked eighth in the world in terms of military expenditures?
The answer, of course, is that the Japan Self-Defense Force (JSDF) is a stealth army. Just flip a switch and the "pacifist" nation of Japan would be one of the world's largest military powers overnight. Consider that the JSDF is ranked as the 18th largest military in the world with 247,150 active personnel. Not bad for a country with "no military," hey?
Still don't believe me? Just look at the Izumo-class destroyer unveiled by the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force in 2013. Go on, look at it.
You would be forgiven for thinking that you are looking at an aircraft carrier, a.k.a. the centerpiece of any modern combat fleet and a prerequisite for any nation looking to claim a place in the pantheon of world military powers. But you are officially looking at a "helicopter destroyer." Oh, sure, it happens to look and function exactly like an aircraft carrier, and, yes, it could be used to launch fixed-wing aircraft exactly like an aircraft carrier, but it's totally not an aircraft carrier. It's just for launching helicopters. You know, for peacekeeping missions. Honest.
Or look at Japan's Epsilon solid-fuel rockets. Used to launch scientific satellites, the rockets can deliver a 1.2 ton payload to low earth orbit. But, as is always pointed out whenever the US or their partners in crime are looking to demonize the boogeyman-de-jour, a rocket for delivering scientific satellites is just an intercontinental ballistic missile in disguise.
Far and away the most telling (and alarming) aspect of the Japanese stealth army, however, is its covert nuclear program. As I discussed with Joseph Trento in 2012, the Japanese government has colluded with the US government for decades in a secret, illegal program to amass tons of weapons-grade plutonium. Trento exposed the program in an investigation for the National Security News Service six years ago.
As the article explained:
"The United States deliberately allowed Japan access to the United States’ most secret nuclear weapons facilities while it transferred tens of billions of dollars worth of American tax paid research that has allowed Japan to amass 70 tons of weapons grade plutonium since the 1980s, a National Security News Service investigation reveals. These activities repeatedly violated U.S. laws regarding controls of sensitive nuclear materials that could be diverted to weapons programs in Japan. The NSNS investigation found that the United States has known about a secret nuclear weapons program in Japan since the 1960s, according to CIA reports."As outrageous as this story is, it is all the more outrageous that Japan is not just an ostensibly non-nuclear nation, but even pretends to adhere to the Three Non-Nuclear Principles of "non-production, non-possession, and non-introduction" of nuclear weapons set out by former Prime Minister Eisaku Satō in 1967. Given the insane hysteria that has surrounded Iran's own nuclear program over the last decade, the discovery that the Japanese government has been colluding to amass weapons-grade plutonium for a secret nuclear weapons program should have been the political scandal of the century in Japan and a major international news story. But since Japan is a US ally (and since the US government was itself illegally colluding in the scandal) the entire story became a minor footnote barely even mentioned in the mainstream (and even then, only to downplay the scandal).
But all of this is not enough for the Abes and the Koizumis and the other misleaders of Japan who have been chomping at the bit for decades to take off the Article 9 fig leaf and expose Japan's military might. Article 9 has been under attack at least since former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi committed Japanese forces to aid in the occupation of Iraq. This was not a combat deployment, of course. The JSDF was confined to digging trenches and handing out lollipops (or some such codswallop) but it was an important test of Japan's "Anti-Terrorism Special Measures Law," enacted in the wake of 9/11, which granted the government the leeway to provide "cooperation and support" to "Foreign Forces" (read: the US) on foreign soil without it being taken as an abrogation of Article 9.
More recently, the Abe administration infamously pushed through a "reinterpretation" of Article 9have hampered plans to revise Article 9.) that allows the government to participate in "collective self-defense" missions (read: killing boogeymen wherever and whenever Uncle Sam comes a-callin') without breaching the whole "we renounce war forever" platitudes. And the debate continues as the hardliners continue to push for not just reinterpretation but wholesale revision of the pesky constitutional clause. (But here's some #GoodNewsNextWeek: Abe's recent domestic political scandals
Regardless of whether the constitution is amended or not, though, the writing is on the wall. The Japanese government is too busy buying US missile defense systems and building their own cruise missiles to worry about whether or not they get their way on the constitutional debate. At this particular moment in time they're using the "threat" from North Korea to justify the military build up. The smart money is betting that if peace on the Korean peninsula really does come about then the "threat" used to justify the build up will just switch to China. And if China suddenly became the US' best buddies, it would be another imaginary bogey somewhere else in the world. Just like in 1984, it doesn't really matter who the enemy is, or even if the enemy actually exists; all that matters is that the public goes along with the story.
So for the time being we still live in a world where Japan "doesn't have a military" (nudge nudge, wink wink). In the very near future we may be living in a world where (well, waddaya know?) Japan does have a military, and a pretty sizable one at that! And in reality, nothing will have changed.
Soldiers die sooner. I imagine a world were countries trust each other with compassion. If we supported each other as much as we try to destroy each other, imagine the progress and happyness. I can't even imagine how beautiful humanity would be since we never been in such a place.
It's true that most of us do not want war and want to live in peace. Governments apparently are not "most of us" and have no intention to massage a message of peace and cooperation. Where is the profit in that? I go back to the old hippie phrase: "What would happen if there was a war and no one showed up?"
Spot on my friend! That day will come soon, people are waking to the absolute bull that is our world media currently 💯🐒
Well said. I suspect that most of us want to live in peace, but we are fed a bunch of BS and propaganda that turn us against each other according to the enemy flavor of the day à la Orwell 1984, and as dictated by the interests of banks and corporations that own us and our governments and are the true enemy.
Japan has been turned completely upside down since 3/11.
Like Jim Stone says,this is what financial warfare looks like.
Fukushima was not an accident, all of the technology that can be used to make it look like a natural disaster and an accident will be used to make it appear that way.
Tsunami bombs have been possible since the 1940's
I never realised it was actually documented that Tsunami bombs existed. The in baffles are people ignorance, but you can blame them as they are completely brainwashed. We are in WW3 "a war of banks not tanks"💯🐒
Thanks for the report. I really miss you and Brock's Asia-Pacific reports. I do think you are both well placed to provide the community with geographically focused reports. Do others agree?
Great job, as usual, James, and the fact you actually have been living in Japan for quite some time puts you in a strategic position to cover this. I fail to see how Japan's hypocritical treachery is compatible with the "saving face" value of the culture, there. Or why working together, as humanity, instead of creating war on all levels, seems to be such an elusive geopolitical concept. Thanks for covering this.
really army are really defrent team i love army
my country is bangladesh sir @corbettreport
It is worrying that this is going on and still people perceived Japan has not being a militarised country. The way I see it if you have a military (a large one at that especially in comparison to your country size) you are threatening. Its like walking around town with a knife in your hand for self defence ! 💯🐒
And we are talking about a nation (the only) that had the "luck" to live through an atomic attack... twice... "oh damn i burned my fingers... pass me the matches please?"
That the SDF is in truth an army is something of an open secret in Japan. Pretty much everyone is well aware if it, and ordinary Japanese even sometimes use the word "army" instead of "SDF".
Public opinion still seems to be mostly against changing Article 9, which may be one reason why Abe has found it so hard to do despite putting all his political force behind doing so for the past several years. But like you say, it may not make any difference. Just as US presidents go around the US constitution and no longer ask Congress to declare war but go ahead and send in troops themselves, so too will the Japanese gov just ignore Article 9.
Will that make a difference? I suppose it depends on what the US demands Japan do or what rightwingers manage to gain power here in Japan.
We have a similar article in Italy's CONstitution, which is clearly bs anyway since we'been everywhere the US has been since ww2 and also currently.
And it's not the administrations or the Shinzo Abes to really blame..it's the mercenaries that to this day are still deciding to join the cult of the military (or police, for that matter).
If you want peace you must prepare for war.
The Japanese face legitimate threats from the Koreans and Chinese which are both fairly belligerent military powers and historical enemies. It's not 1945 anymore and the US is trying to dial back being the free security for Japan and Europe.
Just possessing plutonium is not much of a nuclear weapons program.
The point is that the Japanese have been building up an army and a nuclear since well before the North Koreans - theoretically - became a real threat. Also, if you want to talk history, just take a look at Japan's past and tell me how the Koreans and Chinese are not totally justified in mistrusting Japan. The US - and their Japanese lap dogs currently in control - are the number one threat in the region, not the Chinese or the Koreans. And, like James, I live in Japan...
The Japanese and Koreans have been fighting each other since well before there was a North Korea. If the Koreans and Chinese are justified in mistrusting Japan, and they are, why would Japan trust them, given their history? Without the US, who has a bigger military, Japan or China?
You are alarmed that the Japanese possess plutonium but the Chinese have had actual nuclear weapons since the 60s. It is widely believed that the N. Koreans possess functioning nuclear missiles capable of hitting Japan. China is acting belligerently and imperialistically, they are claiming various islands and building military instillations on them. Are the Japanese doing that?
I don't know so much about China, but I know that what nuclear weapons the North Koreans possess they possess because of the US breaking promises. And as for Japanese aggression, they have already claimed various islands. And whilst they may have no real "military" installations of their own, they certainly allow plenty of them to be built and maintained. In short, I agree that China and North Korea are acting increasingly aggressively, but I really don't think they are the ones responsible. All current problems seem to pretty much undeniably trace back to US - and other western - interference in the region: even the main reason for Japan's imperialistic foray into mainland East Asia was in response to European and American empire-building. So it seems to me that the only requirement for talking about Chinese and North Korean aggression is to first ignore past and current Japanese and Japanese-sanctioned aggression.
No, they possess nuclear weapons as a bargaining chip to get more welfare. That and they cannot really afford to maintain the massive conventional forces they have, all those soldiers and artillery pieces cost a fortune to maintain, nuclear weapons are relatively cheap as a deterrent.
Seems like you want to blame Americans for problems that began well before we even showed up. The east is like the middle east, they have been fighting each other for thousands of years, westerners are late to the party, blaming them is foolish.
What little military capacity Japan currently has is dwarfed by both china and N. Korea, the N. Koreans have a million man standing army in addition to their nuclear arsenal.
re: ' ... the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation ... ' Are either the Japanese military or government the Japanese people referred to in that document?
The rising sun🇯🇵 ⁉️
The only reason for using water cooled nuclear reactor is to get weapon grade plutonium. And Japan has what 50 of them? And the funny thing after Fukushima they turned 10 or so off and no one wonders why there is no shortish for electricity and why they where running before if you did not net the power.
"Codswallop" James? I thought that was a UK expression.
As a fiat currency, the USD can fail at any moment. Now, is the perfect time, to approach our Pacific alliances (Philippines too) and negotiate the transfer of USPACOM over to a group of nations consisting of; Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand as well as secondary allies the ASEAN group of nations. Better to have BRICS and China contend with it's nearest neighbors, than a U.S. Fleet that can no longer project the same military force, on a sustained basis, as it once did, back in the 1960's. The PACOM sell off can settle a few exchange debts and strengthen the value of the US T-bond.