You'll have to present an argument, since you made the claim. Would you like to do a formal debate on this with me on my YouTube channel? I'll let you pick the moderator.
Your evidence: A fiction novel. Man. If you don't want to have a rational discussion, it's fine. I presented a resource in my last comment to address your Charles Dickens "argument."
You'd have to understand and read about private law society (or understand the simple reality of self-ownership) to be able to have this conversation in a meaningful way.
You'll have to present an argument, since you made the claim. Would you like to do a formal debate on this with me on my YouTube channel? I'll let you pick the moderator.
http://static.springer.com/sgw/documents/1594178/application/pdf/2014+Gordon+Tullock+Prize+Winner.pdf
I don't do any youtube.
And you were the first making a claim - that private cops are better then state ones. And you ignored the evidence. So... no, I don't see any sense.
Your evidence: A fiction novel. Man. If you don't want to have a rational discussion, it's fine. I presented a resource in my last comment to address your Charles Dickens "argument."
You'd have to understand and read about private law society (or understand the simple reality of self-ownership) to be able to have this conversation in a meaningful way.
My evidence: logic. If you don't want a rational discussion, it's fine. Just don't ignore what people say.
A private police is like a state police without democratic control and additional profit interest, which is always good for some corruption.
For the other point: If you prefer scientific papers to a novel, feel free to take them.
Another claim, unsubstantiated by an evidence-based argument.