You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What's The Difference Between HQ, FULLHQ and 4KHQ Posts?

in #hq8 years ago (edited)

Hmm, very educational
I am a newbie I guess so these terms are new to me.
I think I get the 4KHQ - Cant put them into any box kind of thing. But do they need to be funny? - Monty Python?
I get the HQ no problem
Reading this has made me look at my own work now.
I recently did a couple of posts that Im uncertain as what I would have classified them as.
As an artist I have done some weird projects in my time that could not be placed into any category, some had humor some were more serious and I have done posts on them. I am not quite sure but perhaps they were FULLHQ.
Fascinating stuff.

Sort:  

The thing about FULLHQ and 4KHQ is that others have to decide they fit those categories.
I will say too, that this post contains a bit of parody and is not to be taken 100% at face value......

I get the parody:
But the way I see it, in one sense this post is HQ because it is educational
It is also FULLHQ because it is self expression and made for the fun of it, I guess.
But then it is 4KHQ because of the content and not to be take at face value.
I am not even going to ask about FAUX HQ - no idea of what that´s about.

I think you've just shed your Steemit diapers with your analysis. You're doing well. Faux HQ is a jab at the mediocre, subpar shitposts that used to be a mainstay of the trending pages. Today, I noticed there is a shift underway, and i think it's getting much better.....

Ha ha ha great to hear!
The description of Faux HQ sounds hysterical to me. You could almost start a trend where posts were deliberately made as boring as possible - but then we have already got FaceBook for that.
Thanks Stella