Right, setting your default rewards to "declined" will keep the 60's and 70's from killing your rep.
Downvotes from people with lower rep than you won't hurt your rep.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Right, setting your default rewards to "declined" will keep the 60's and 70's from killing your rep.
Downvotes from people with lower rep than you won't hurt your rep.
Thanks, for the info. I've modified my sig - "setting your rewards to "declined" doesn't seem to protect you from loss of rep, although it does dissuade steemcleaners and steemflagrewards"
@freezepeach please consider reviewing this case for @starworld
@steemflagrewards please consider reviewing this case for @starworld
Denied. I see libel.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
It shouldn't @starworld unless they FUBAR-ed the code.
I'll talk to @bullionstackers and see if we can get this sorted. I don't know what you did to incur his wrath. Maybe he has a good reason but won't know until I look into it further.
Well, the rewards are tied only to steem-power and the posts with payouts below zero are hidden, but the rep thing, yeah, are you sure it's just the one account with (25) rep that's taking your rep down? Because the "don't worry about your rep from smaller accounts" was specifically mentioned by @themarkymark, who I would imagine knows as much about this stuff as anyone.
If the downvoters rep is higher than yours, it comes down to how large the downvote to determine how much rep is loss, not how much rep they have.
Zoiks. Thanks for the info.
Well, I'm freeing-up some steem-power to delegate to @freezepeach and I'm trying to encourage others to do the same. Even a delegation of 1 steem-power would go a long way to showing token support for their efforts to protect "the little guys".