It's about 0.7% off of the 9.5% that curators are supposed to get AFAIK, maybe you've been too busy voting up declined reward posts for attention and yourself to get downvoted that your APR is that low. While we don't actively focus on maximizing APR and often vote on posts that are past 24h, etc, we still curate manually and attempt to not overreward users so that's probably why we still do okay.
Didn't you forget this one, snake?
You didn't mention a "should be earning" - you said to compare it to others... and it earns a higher APR than most.
I've never been concerned with APR - because that is not one of the goals of @Abundance.Tribe
This conversation is about OCDB, and you claiming that it would have been a hit to your "already low" APR to remove your HUGE over-reward.
Didn't forget it, it's not a project that asks for or receives delegations from the community.
I can go find a bunch of other community curation accounts if you want...
Guarantee almost every single one earns a lower APR than OCDB does.
Last I checked it was at 8.5 and others were higher when I placed that comment, not sure the reasons it's gone up lately but it's not something we look at often.
Anyway, people noticed this post and downvoted it and as discussed with @ura-soul re-voting is already something being discussed to be fixed so not really interested in wasting more time discussing this with irrelevant people.