No problem. I give there my answer (https://ecency.com/hive-189312/@steembasicincome/the-price-of-hive-sbi-subscriptions-will-never-change#@yecier/re-steembasicincome-202518t16394420z)
Hope now with the clarification that I made and miss here because I feel it implicit (my bad) you understand my point (that doesn’t mean you should do it).
That's not such a bad idea. I apologize for not understanding your intent originally. We do see a couple of these posts every pump cycle.
Still the core idea is to provide incentives for supporting each other (people that can't afford 1 HIVE are not the target market to become sponsors, they should be supporting the accounts that have the HIVE and use it for regular giveaways).
If the price is too low, it creates implications around minimum upvote values (minimum vote is 0.021 for blockchain structural reasons) and upvote delivery, especially if HIVE starts going down again.
We did originally launch when STEEM was at $2, and I was comfortable with the pricing even when it ran a bit higher. Subsequent pump cycles have not matched the highs from the original cycle we launched into, but if they do I will look into the technical requirements to implement decimal units.
The mistake was mine because I thouhg about specified that but then keep writing and kinda forgot about say that detail.
Hope one day Hive reach 10 dollars and beyond and we have to analyse this idea again.