It is evident that the chair of the SEC, Gary Gensler, is completely clueless about cryptocurrency. We all know he is against it yet it also appears that he really knows nothing about it. This is a problem since he is in such a powerful position.
Nevertheless, this is commonplace these days. Governments are filled with politicians and bureaucrats who have a lot of power but very little sense. He certainly epitomizes this.
In a recent interview with the Washington Post, Gensler claimed that he doubts the longevity of cryptocurrency. He, naturally, feels that it is highly speculative and requires a lot of regulation.
No surprise considering he nothing more than a former banker who taught cryptocurrency at MIT.
Technology Changes History
The Chair claims to be open to innovation and technology. Of course, here again he seems to be ignorant of what it does.
Here is a statement from the interview linked above:
So, public money has a certain place around the globe. Private monies usually don't last that long. So, I don't think there's a long-term viability for five- or six thousand private forms of money. History tells us otherwise. So, in the meantime, I think it's worthwhile to have an investor protection regime placed around this.
History often "tells us otherwise" until something changes it. This is often technology. We see this happen all the time. What occurred 6 or 7 times in the past suddenly is no longer the case.
Remember, the past does not equal the future.
For example, there was never a time in human history where information could flow around the world at near instantaneous speed for free. That was absolutely preposterous right up until the 1980s. Since that point in time, does anyone question this concept?
So the Chair does not seem to think that 5 or 6 thousand private forms of money can survive?
Isn't that ironic that it is right around the same time that Mayor Suarez is updating everyone on MiamiCoin. He stated that the City of Miami is receiving about $2,000 every 10 minutes. This is money that was converted to USD and is sitting in the City's coffers. To date, it is about $5 million since the project started.
The Mayor further goes on to state:
“It’s interesting because it’s not an involuntary tax, it’s not philanthropy, it’s something that is completely different and could revolutionize the way governments are funded in the future.”
“It’s theoretically possible that the city could generate enough taxes through MiamiCoin so that our residents don’t have to pay one cent in tax.”
Isn't that something?
It is important to point out that even though Miami is a government entity, the money is consider private since it is not generated by the Central Bank. Thus, even though the City did the project, the money is created privately.
So we have the Mayor of Miami theorizing about citizens not having to pay taxes while the SEC Chair is saying he doubts whether 5K-6K private currencies can survive. This can only make us wonder how long it takes for other municipalities and towns to get onboard with the idea. It is possible we see that thousands successful currencies globally under this program alone.
We then have a concept that is known as the Lindy Effect. Here we see the idea of a non-perishable item such as technology will have a longer life expectancy as it ages.
This from Wikipedia:
The Lindy effect (also known as Lindy's Law[1]) is a theorized phenomenon by which the future life expectancy of some non-perishable things, like a technology or an idea, is proportional to their current age. Thus, the Lindy effect proposes the longer a period something has survived to exist or be used in the present, it is also likely to have a longer remaining life expectancy. Longevity implies a resistance to change, obsolescence or competition and greater odds of continued existence into the future.[2] Where the Lindy effect applies, mortality rate decreases with time. Mathematically, the Lindy effect corresponds to lifetimes following a Pareto probability distribution.
Naturally, we can see how this is in play with cryptocurrency. Bitcoin is more than 12 years old and is only getting stronger. Few doubt that this will not continue for decades ahead. At the same time, other cryptocurrencies are only getting stronger as their platforms expand.
Cryptocurrency is a technology that is presently used by 225 million people. It is also seeing massive adoption, meaning we could be near the 300 million mark by the end of the year.
Protecting The Bankers
People like Gensler often cite investor protection. This is total nonsense. The only ones they want to protect, at least in the United States, is the banking industry. It is no surprise since, guess where Gensler got his start: Goldman Sachs.
Of course, what is a good story without some ironic twist?
Most are aware the SEC has denied every application for a Bitcoin ETF to date. This certainly is not solely on Gensler since it happened under previous Chairs. However, the policy has not shifted under him either.
Here is where the twist enters the picture.
If Gensler is so anti-Bitcoin and cryptocurrency, why would he not stand up against a Bitcoin Futures ETF? There is speculation that this will be approved by the end of October. Canada already approved ETFs and is expanding the offerings that are legal.
So now Gensler is somewhat warm to an ETF as long as it is tied to the futures? This is where we see the bankers in control.
Gensler knows what took place with the futures market in silver. For decades banks were found to be manipulating the price. They were fined and carried on. The same could be true of Bitcoin.
Hence, the Chair is not dulling the edge he has against Bitcoin. Instead, he is just sharpening it. He is well aware that banks will make a fortune manipulating the market while also likely making the price action unappealing to most. In the end, average investors will lose while the banks gain.
This is what ex-Goldman Sachs employees who are appointed to government oversight positions do.
We are not dealing with the idea of protecting investors. There is nothing here that is looking out for the best interest of the average individual. Instead it is merely a way to favor those who corrupted the establishment for decades.
Of course, there is another ironic twist. Bitcoin is not the only game in town. While it is the largest, by market cap, and most established, innovation is not stopping. As the development in cryptocurrency expands, we are going to see the entire scope of things widening. This is something that the Chair does not appear to understand.
The fact that cryptocurrency is technology means that it follows predictable patterns. One of them is that if it is dammed up, it will only make the impact when the dam burst that much more powerful. Technology is like water in that it just builds until it overwhelms whatever is in front of it. It is why things are very slow for long period of time and then an exponential elbow is hit. The existing players try to keep the status quo until the force gets to the point where they are obliterated.
It is impossible to know when that elbow is hit. We are looking at massive growth in the past few years. How many more will it take? That is hard to say. We do know this is something that is taking place global, with players from many different countries involved. As we see with Mayor Suarez, we also have governments starting to stake their claim.
All of this will eventually overrun people like Gensler. Our defense is still developing in ways that they cannot attack. Simultaneously, we keep pushing adoption to the point that the numbers are simply impossible for them to deal with.
SEC Chair Gensler is clueless about cryptocurrency because he doesn't want to truly know. He is only concerned about maintain the status quo for the banking industry. Fortunately, technology is moving in the direction where people like him will be less relevant in the future.
If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.
gif by @doze
logo by @st8z
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I wonder how much these guys actually believe their statements. Does he thinks that parallels between two things mean that they are identical. "It's like the wild west", yeah, in some ways, but it's also really really not like that at all. I love how they use this "keeping us safe" excuse, while meanwhile regular people can't participate in IPO's and ICO's and the bulk of the gains go to institutions.
It is debatable in general, if the fact that this one (out of 1000) crazy guy who sold his house and grandma for the latest investment idea (and got bankrupt) is sufficient proof for regulation in order to safe investors. 999 guys that also bought into the idea and lost some of their risk capital had bought a valuable lesson for further investments (at least).
That is true. It is also why the wealth distribution just keeps on growing. We are seeing those wealthy get involved in things that average people are excluded because they are not accredited investors.
It is a convenient way to keep the system exclusionary.
Yet people can go to casinos or bet on state lotteries, yet they are excluded from many types of securities.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I think they are already invest privately, he just doing his job, protecting the role of the US dollar in the world. Here is he just representing.
Investor protection says Gary Gensler. It will be cemetery security, I mean. With weak economies and protectionism of the most powerful. They only fight to stay in their privileged position and crypto is seen as a problem rather than an opportunity for the world ruling class.
It certainly does not scream inclusion.
Of course, he was the youngest to achieve partner in Goldman Sachs so where know what this guy is all about.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I can't hear this, investor protection bullshit anymore. I rather like a Warrant Buffet approach to this: invest only in things you understand or have knowledge of. Get people educated on cryptocurrency in general, but this will never be a class in public school.
I wonder if some private schools are doing it, but word of mouth at private school is already doing the trick, I guess.
Obviously they want to prop up the current system. The BTC ETF still has to follow the regulations of the current system and they can control things somewhat.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I don't want to paid the devil on the wall, but one or the other thing will lead to civil on global scale. There so many people attached to the old money systems, that I can't stop think of someone will start war over it. Look what IWF did with Ecuador and their request for support on using BTC as a legit currency.
Of course. They want the expansion of this industry on their terms only.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
That's laughable 😂😂 .."he doubts the longevity"
There were stupid statements about the Internet.
That statement is not going to play well.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Bill Gates back in the day went around the world and said 512 MB is enough for private use. 😂
I have text files which are bigger than that. LOL
Well tech is always changing. These boring dinosaurs are so behind the curve. The minute they pass a reg someone will create something to bypass it.
Only if the development is outside their scope.
That is what we need to focus upon.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I think they actually know exactly what is going on, but their interest in having the current system protected by all means, is far bigger than we cryptocurrency enthusiasts can do. But I guess, they bet on the wrong horse.
It is very hard for people (and cooperations) that succeed in a system (and getting chair may count here) to change perspective and getting a clue on things that will come. That is Life‘s tragedy, and Mr. Hensley will be no exemption.
I never heard of the Lindy effect, but wonder if it would also stand against progress and evolution by solidify aged concepts. Central Banks are also non-perishable things - longer around than crypto … ergo with a higher Life expectancy according to Lindy - I hope not.
That is true although the Lindy Effect does not say indefinite life expectancy. We see many things replaced by something better, especially when driven by technology.
But you bring up a valid point. Do not buy into the online bs that Central Banks are going away and governments are going to fail overnight. It might over time but not soon.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Is it cluelessness or corruption? I guess that's the beauty of it, hard to tell, eh?
I wrote a blog about Gary Ginsler, Silvio Micali, Algorand and their connections here. (post old not fishing for votes) I thought I would drop that post here for some interesting additional reading about Ginsler and his connections to banking and MIT.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
That's my question. Clueless or corrupt? Perhaps the supply chain tracking should be applied to politics, politicians, and their cash flow relationships?
Perhaps their corruption keeps them clueless.
Maybe it prevents them from looking at what is really going on.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Yes indeed, very astute! I believe your observation is likely. It appears to me, that 'They', meaning regulators, are not 'technical' people. They are 'ideological' people. Ideas can easily blind one from seeing the technically accurate details, and at the same time provide seemingly unending justification for 'technically' corrupt behavior.
Technically, there is no going back to what was. The evolution is underway. The cat is out of the bag, so to speak. Perhaps a more accurate analogy is the 'damn has cracked'. The water will now begin to seek it's lowest level at an increasing pace and the compound momentum will eventually lead to a cavalcade of sorts. Try as they might, ideals alone cannot contain a technical reality. Tidal waves do their thing... ;)
Blockchain developers do not answer to the Gary Gensler's of the world nor the SEC.
I'm curious, as well versed as you are, can you point to any decentralized 'on-ramp' / 'off-ramp' projects? Perhaps an article on that? An involved topic for certain. Those ramps are the one 'valve' in the regulatory framework that appear most capable of corrupting the evolution of the free flow of currency. It seems to me that the 'MiamiCoin' is the sort of evolving rendition of decentralized, yet geographically local, on / off 'ramps'.
Very interested to hear your thoughts on that!
Great way to get more SEO for both these posts since they are both about the same topic. In fact, since your is older, having the link in the comment section will only affirm your post to the search enginges.
Never a bad idea to drop older posts in the comments on Leofinance where they are applicable. It helps the rankings of the entire site.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Wow, awesome, thank you for the tip!
I have been seeing the headlines about some of his comments and I have been avoiding reading them because I know it will just set me off. Great breakdown of his level of stupidity here. They are going to be so ticked off when they realize they put themselves in such a bad position...
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
It does take some practice in Stoicism to be able to handle the stupidity and corruption of these parasites.
Sad that we have to deal with this but here we are.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Well, politicians will never understand this technology because it does not benefit them at all since they cannot control it.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
True but this one isnt a politicians. He was not elected to office, he was appointed.
But same ilk, politicians and bureaucrats. Only in it to protect themselves and their friends.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
This is an amazing post, banks and financial institutions behind them know it, they know power is slipping away, but they also know how to create "financial products" to earn money. ETF, futures, exchange savings are not Satoshi´s children, they are banks´s products.
These guys are powerful and the only way to protect ourselves is EDUCATION, we need (must) learn/teach about this awesome tech and its true potential as PEOPLE´S MONEY.
Great article, thank you very much @taskmaster4450
We do need to understand what is going on. The other way to protect ourselves is to keep decentralizing and distributing. But making what we are creating wide and expansion, we can pull in large numbers from around the world.
That is a problem for the centralized entities that are out there.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
And this is a MAJOR problem, there are so many centralized entities around us, and most of us don´t even know what crentralization means. Education is the only way out!
I think he is well aware of what crypto, blockchain represent.
The dilemma here has to do for the people he is working for.
He used to work for Goldman-Sachs and then for the SEC to protect again the banks.
His approach will always be bias concerning crypto or
sort of against it in the long run.
All he is doing buy time for the banks to dictate
the way crypto will grow so they can somehow control it.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
He might be trying to do that but we are seeing something else taking place: massive development. It is a battle of wills right now.
There will be massive negotiations taking place down the road. In the US, this means lobbyists, court cases, and lots of money.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
The reason why they haven't done anything about crypto is because they don't have the powers to and are attempting to use scare tactics and talk shit about crypto in order to get the house to give the SEC more powers to create new laws. THIS IS THE LAST THING WE NEED
A government with more powers putting more restrictions on it's people is not the way it's not the American way and that's drastically been changing since 2001. It pains me to see American citizens losing more freedoms, paying more taxes and relying more and more on the government. That is not what so many people fought and died for.
Most will say it's not a big deal but it really is, as soon as this law passes what comes next and next and next. It's a downward slope and not a good one for people.
The American way left the borders long ago.
It is now tyranny, just a matter of what scale you believe it is on.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
The weird thing is... he used to teach the blockchain course at MIT. He should be extremely knowledgeable... and yet...
Well teaching it does not mean he fully understands it, especially in light of his bias towards it.
He is a banker and Wall Street vet, a very successful one at that.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Well you pretty much responded for me towards the end...
Your headlines misleading because he's not clueless at all, he's a fox.
He might not see the large scope because of his alliances, but if you watch his classes at MIT he's certainly not clueless.
Yes he is cunning and has an approach that could be concluded as an agenda.
There is little doubt as to what he is after in my view.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
<><
@taskmaster4450, you've been given LUV from @pixresteemer.
Check the LUV in your H-E wallet. (5/5)
~~~ embed:1440769753451171840 twitter metadata:SGl2ZVBvbGlzaHx8aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS9IaXZlUG9saXNoL3N0YXR1cy8xNDQwNzY5NzUzNDUxMTcxODQwfA== ~~~
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the person sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.
I thought he was pro crypto and then switched sides giving everyone false hope. I haven't paid much attention to him besides what articles are in leofinance to be honest. Looks like he is out of his depth as they cannot control Bitcoin and that will be clearly obvious as they try.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Good one here
MiamiCoin is only going to be a ginning. There is going to be many governments without enough cash and many investors of cryptocurrency with lot of value locked in them. I still don't support investing into these for any reason other than making some quick gains.
We need to support true decentralized projects that empower private individuals and companies; not governments.
!PIZZA
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
$PIZZA@taskmaster4450! I sent you a slice of on behalf of @vimukthi.
Learn more about $PIZZA Token at hive.pizza (3/10)
That is true. He does want to stop it. Of course, his statements also counter what is taking place at the base level.
Will he get the laws and power he wants from Congress? Most likely. Will it push a lot of stuff offshore? Probably.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta