What is '50% more reap'?
Also, I'll agree to almost anything that reduces financial incentives to curate, as such incentives replace actual curative interest with mere financial avarice, which deranges curation and degrades Hive marketing. I prefer curation rewards simply go away. They are not only useless, being unnecessary to convince people to upvote content they like as myriad platforms without any financial incentive to upvote content have continually demonstrated since Steem advented, but are counterproductive, and actually harm curation, as Trending reveals.
Thanks!
I think it's the love of money that makes trending what it is.
Greedy folks gonna greed.™
IF we keep changing the rules to suit ourselves soon we will have no game to play.
We've already reduced most of the gamification.
50% more reap refers to the fact that nobody really ran their mana down below 50% because it was voting intensive, now they can easily vote it all and only play the game one day in five.
This will increase volatility in the rewards.
While also allowing access to 50% more stake than yesterday.
You can already play the game 0 out of 5 days through delegation, autovotes, and curation trails.
Yes, and now one's lackeys need only show up one day in five.
What wasn't happening before was accessing that last 50% of one's hp.
Nobody not here just for the money needed this change.
You're just making stuff up show me these accounts and the change in the behavior.
Nothing is going to change these bots are already programmed and there's no reason to change them to do the kind of stupid shit you're assuming they will. There are still bots that vote at the 5 minute mark from 5 years ago. Change is slow. No one is being incentivized to do less work than they were already doing. Doing the work was always optional.
Look at their voting mana, those lower than 50% are proof.
Should be pretty easy to pull that number.
Might take a while for folks to notice and change their behavior.
But, this is an easy metric to track.
I vote 20 times a day.
Now my vote power is 0%.
Behavior didn't change.
Sorry do you want behavior to change or not I can't tell from these responses.
If you could go ahead and name one single hardfork change you agreed with that would be great because I'm beginning to suspect these are automatic contrarian takes.
I was all for the poor tax being repealed.
'Memba that?
This curation change was not needed, people were doing just fine.
Who asked for it, and why was it not openly discussed before the proclamation as a fait accompli?
Like I said, easy metric to track.
Care to do the honors of pulling the numbers from before the fork so we have a baseline from which to argue?
I did vote my mana down. That's why I reduced my vote weight to 25% years ago, so that I could vote more without depleting my vote mana - and I still depleted my mana until I exceeded the dust threshhold too often.