While I do not believe this post is directly plagiarized, it is also not "original" in the true sense of the word. Just paraphrasing and rephrasing the information that can be found in Wikipedia and other online sources about an illness does not make an article original. There needs to be original thought and original conclusions; something to add value to the post. I do not see anything here except the short original story about a childhood friend who had juvenile diabetes that adds anything at all to what I can learn by just visiting the Wikipedia article. There is nothing wrong with this post necessarily, but neither would I say this post is exceptional. You see a lot of this kind of posting and it really doesn't add any value to the platform.