I identified him as a quack two months ago when he made a post about EOS. I explained why elliot waves predictions does not work on an ICO that introduces 2,000,000 new tokens into the circulating supply every single day for one year.
His response was rather ignorant saying things like: "I don' care" about the token distribution, and arguing with me about how long it lasts.
My reply on @buggedout has to be interpreted in a context respecting this comment.
The point is that even if someone is believing in Elliot Waves and Technical Analysis, the ongoing distribution of tokens does not allow its application out of its own underlying ideas.
What is the intended meaning of your 'cathchline' ?
@ponts wrote:
My reply on @buggedout has to be interpreted in a context respecting this comment.
The point is that even if someone is believing in Elliot Waves and Technical Analysis, the ongoing distribution of tokens does not allow its application out of its own underlying ideas.
@lexiconical wrote:
Maybe you should read comments more carefully. The contrary was the statement.
Obviously ! What about you ?