I've read the comments and have seen two different opinions on down voting one is @sigmajin who down voted because the content is "bad", frankly I don't think this is a valid reason if I start reading and don't like the post I stop reading and move on, at the most just comment about why it's bad. The second down vote I saw was from @smooth who down voted to counter the massive whale votes, I don't like this reason either, how does @smooth know the whales didn't actually like the post?
Personally I didn't like the article mostly for the reasons @sigmajin presented, but I like down voting even less.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Though I don't agree with your opinion about the post content, you have analyzed the arguments for downvoting this post in a fair & balanced manner. So, though an upvote from me may not be worth much, I've upvoted your comment. :)
it's a theme that is recurring, anyways when there is limited supply we cant all get it, I'm ok with the second reason, the first one I agree with your point, I would comment if it's bad, because I care, nobody helped me so i try to point out flaws, if I'm not welcome I won't care I don't tango with children :)