What do the words of someone else have to do with the questions I've asked you or your treatment of me? I know this is a hard one for you, but the only thing I've judged you on is how you have treated me and others. Just your conduct as a human. I know thats a hard one for you.
So I'll ask you just one question: if I ask you some questions, will you answer them? Or will I just get more dismissal?
Someone said you self proclaimed yourself as a plagiarist so I corrected him.
Just ask your questions, this is one of the most ridiculous conversations I have had in my life. My no way in hell in going through the 100 nonsense comments you left.
I'll ask them one at a time, one comment at a time. So you don't feel overloaded.
Why does the Steemit FAQ contradict the rules you have set down?
New people only have the FAQ to go by. Had I know about the 7 or 8 post limit, we would have never even had this conversation. I'd have also not made separate posts for each off-site social media mirror, had I known that was considered spamming. I was penalized without even knowing these invisible rules exist. Once I found out from you, I even said I'll obey the rules you've set down -- even though I don't like you personally. That didn't get me removed from your bot. I've been obeying them. Which is why I don't think that obeying the rules is what your bot is about.
Well thank you, another brilliant display of not only avoiding my question and twisting my context but yet another false accusation from you to me to add to the list:
"He has almost no understanding of Steem and decides to contact the FBI "
Never at any point did I claim that I had contacted the FBI.
Yes, I've admitted many times that I'm new and thus "have almost no understanding".
You don't have to be living on a remote island to not have heard of your blacklist, you only need to be new to Steemit.
If the Steemit FAQ didn't directly contradict your invisible rules, and you actually took the time to educate us ignorant newbies instead of acting like a sociopath -- your job wouldn't be so thankless. I'd have thanked you, had you acted like a human being.
I still however thank you for educating me on a great many things. Not exactly my preferred method for being educated, but still valuable nonetheless.
I'll ask them one at a time, one comment at a time. So you don't feel overloaded.
Why does the Steemit FAQ contradict the rules you have set down?
New people only have the FAQ to go by. Had I know about the 7 or 8 post limit, we would have never even had this conversation. I'd have also not made separate posts for each off-site social media mirror, had I known that was considered spamming. I was penalized without even knowing these invisible rules exist. Once I found out from you, I even said I'll obey the rules you've set down -- even though I don't like you personally. That didn't get me removed from your bot. I've been obeying them. Which is why I don't think that obeying the rules is what your bot is about.
That was actually @michaellamden68 who posts random porn images/gifs from around the internet a few times a day for $20-40.
What do the words of someone else have to do with the questions I've asked you or your treatment of me? I know this is a hard one for you, but the only thing I've judged you on is how you have treated me and others. Just your conduct as a human. I know thats a hard one for you.
So I'll ask you just one question: if I ask you some questions, will you answer them? Or will I just get more dismissal?
Someone said you self proclaimed yourself as a plagiarist so I corrected him.
Just ask your questions, this is one of the most ridiculous conversations I have had in my life. My no way in hell in going through the 100 nonsense comments you left.
I'll ask them one at a time, one comment at a time. So you don't feel overloaded.
Why does the Steemit FAQ contradict the rules you have set down?
New people only have the FAQ to go by. Had I know about the 7 or 8 post limit, we would have never even had this conversation. I'd have also not made separate posts for each off-site social media mirror, had I known that was considered spamming. I was penalized without even knowing these invisible rules exist. Once I found out from you, I even said I'll obey the rules you've set down -- even though I don't like you personally. That didn't get me removed from your bot. I've been obeying them. Which is why I don't think that obeying the rules is what your bot is about.
My response
Well thank you, another brilliant display of not only avoiding my question and twisting my context but yet another false accusation from you to me to add to the list:
"He has almost no understanding of Steem and decides to contact the FBI "
Never at any point did I claim that I had contacted the FBI.
Yes, I've admitted many times that I'm new and thus "have almost no understanding".
You don't have to be living on a remote island to not have heard of your blacklist, you only need to be new to Steemit.
If the Steemit FAQ didn't directly contradict your invisible rules, and you actually took the time to educate us ignorant newbies instead of acting like a sociopath -- your job wouldn't be so thankless. I'd have thanked you, had you acted like a human being.
I still however thank you for educating me on a great many things. Not exactly my preferred method for being educated, but still valuable nonetheless.
I'll ask them one at a time, one comment at a time. So you don't feel overloaded.
Why does the Steemit FAQ contradict the rules you have set down?
New people only have the FAQ to go by. Had I know about the 7 or 8 post limit, we would have never even had this conversation. I'd have also not made separate posts for each off-site social media mirror, had I known that was considered spamming. I was penalized without even knowing these invisible rules exist. Once I found out from you, I even said I'll obey the rules you've set down -- even though I don't like you personally. That didn't get me removed from your bot. I've been obeying them. Which is why I don't think that obeying the rules is what your bot is about.