I think the concern is that, if it's really Dan, it's a false flag attack. That he intentionally invented a victim to crush Steemit's remaining reputation. Or if he didn't send the funds on purpose, he fabricated a maximally sympathetic backstory (bright-eyed new investor just like Sun, cruelly betrayed) and milked it to the same ends.
It's probably futile of me to ask for people to cool their engines. Forks are almost always born in tumultuous situations, and regardless of the passage of time, the rivalries don't actually just disappear.
All that being said, we all know that two wrongs don't make a right... or at least we should all know this.
BlockTrades is an exchange, and most of the accounts you have listed here are likely ones that belong to their exchange. It is actually a smart business practice for an exchange to split their funds across multiple accounts, to reduce the risk of potential hacks. I don't see anything about BlockTrades having multiple accounts that in of itself speaks of anything evil..
Is it possible that all of these linked transactions can be explained by users who are buying and selling Steem via the BlockTrades.us exchange? The ones using the same memo are obviously the same user, but not everybody sending funds to and from those accounts is using the same memo. Lots of different users are sending and receiving funds to the exchange accounts. For example, even @ned sent funds to @alpha a while back..
If you go to BlockTrades.us and create an account, you can buy a token like STEEM/HIVE through their exchange (STEEM is currently disabled for obvious reasons). If as a user I want to buy STEEM with another currency (such as BTC or ETH) and have my STEEM sent directly to Binance, I am able to put my Binance memo into the Blocktrades exchange site, and buy the STEEM from Blocktrades.
(The image currently shows ETH->HIVE, but ETH->STEEM would work the same way when enabled.)
If I were to submit this trade, Blocktrades would fill the order from one of their accounts, and send my STEEM to the Binance exchange with the memo I supplied. You would see a transaction coming out of one of their exchange accounts with my STEEM going into the exchange using my memo.
As a general idea, he should have asked Steem's witnesses for help. He never tried to contact STEEM witnesses. His first posting on the community was that he was preparing through the law.
Witnesses stole money from him, he have right to sue them.
Yes, I'm still trying to figure out why an individual account owner is excluded from a principle that Tron/JS claimed as being basic. All I see is a bunch of whataboutisms.
Having multiple accounts is definitely not an issue by itself. But Blocktrades created sock puppet accounts in order to take control of the Steem blockchain in a more malicious way than Justin Sun. He introduced Darthknight as a new account and fooled all of us.
Alright, since you have no answer to my previous question, let's try another one and hope it's easier for you. Know I did my best to make it as simple as possible a question for you.
How is a lie in an account intro oost more malicious than a commitment to not freeze accounts or stake, to then do exactly that as the top20 witnesses on Steem have almost all done?
Are you even serious right now? Why should witnesses know who he is? Do they know who you are? Why? Because he has a fat wallet...?
Any bank in the world would have initiated procedures to cancel the “stolen credit card” asap. And trust me...I hate banks more than anything. This whole thing is a joke...
Oh no, someone made money. THE HORROR! If only he offered a free service that didn't actually work and sucked from the reward pool, then he could be just like you @heimindanger.
Is the suggestion being made that if its indeed Dan (blocktrades), then it's OK to freeze the funds and steal them?
I mean, does it matter who the funds belong to? What if they belong to Iran's government, would that make theft OK?
I'm confused as to the need to contort like this to "justify" the action.
I think the concern is that, if it's really Dan, it's a false flag attack. That he intentionally invented a victim to crush Steemit's remaining reputation. Or if he didn't send the funds on purpose, he fabricated a maximally sympathetic backstory (bright-eyed new investor just like Sun, cruelly betrayed) and milked it to the same ends.
mad props if true, but I doubt it
hive가 먼저 도둑질을 했다.
무료 돈을받지 못하는 것은 도둑질입니다. 고마워, 나는 이것을 배울 필요가 있었다.
an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind
vengeance is not justice
It's probably futile of me to ask for people to cool their engines. Forks are almost always born in tumultuous situations, and regardless of the passage of time, the rivalries don't actually just disappear.
All that being said, we all know that two wrongs don't make a right... or at least we should all know this.
BlockTrades is an exchange, and most of the accounts you have listed here are likely ones that belong to their exchange. It is actually a smart business practice for an exchange to split their funds across multiple accounts, to reduce the risk of potential hacks. I don't see anything about BlockTrades having multiple accounts that in of itself speaks of anything evil..
Is it possible that all of these linked transactions can be explained by users who are buying and selling Steem via the BlockTrades.us exchange? The ones using the same memo are obviously the same user, but not everybody sending funds to and from those accounts is using the same memo. Lots of different users are sending and receiving funds to the exchange accounts. For example, even @ned sent funds to @alpha a while back..
If you go to BlockTrades.us and create an account, you can buy a token like STEEM/HIVE through their exchange (STEEM is currently disabled for obvious reasons). If as a user I want to buy STEEM with another currency (such as BTC or ETH) and have my STEEM sent directly to Binance, I am able to put my Binance memo into the Blocktrades exchange site, and buy the STEEM from Blocktrades.
(The image currently shows ETH->HIVE, but ETH->STEEM would work the same way when enabled.)
If I were to submit this trade, Blocktrades would fill the order from one of their accounts, and send my STEEM to the Binance exchange with the memo I supplied. You would see a transaction coming out of one of their exchange accounts with my STEEM going into the exchange using my memo.
riduculous
This whole reasoning and defending it is getting more ridiculous with the day. Did I say ridiculous? I meant pathetic, of course.
@blocktrades, @minority-report and @alpha are owned by same person. All the transfers from bots (@postpromoter, @buildawhale) are payments for delegation, payment from @steemit is for proposal system development.
Even if @darthknight is @blocktrades, who cares? Anyone can have more accounts.
Witnesses stole money from him, he have right to sue them.
They just want a justification to steal people's funds.
Grasping at straws.
Yes, I'm still trying to figure out why an individual account owner is excluded from a principle that Tron/JS claimed as being basic. All I see is a bunch of whataboutisms.
Having multiple accounts is definitely not an issue by itself. But Blocktrades created sock puppet accounts in order to take control of the Steem blockchain in a more malicious way than Justin Sun. He introduced Darthknight as a new account and fooled all of us.
How is that more malicious than getting the exchanges involved to install 20 sock puppet witnesses? Please explain me.
crickets
Alright, since you have no answer to my previous question, let's try another one and hope it's easier for you. Know I did my best to make it as simple as possible a question for you.
How is a lie in an account intro oost more malicious than a commitment to not freeze accounts or stake, to then do exactly that as the top20 witnesses on Steem have almost all done?
I'm proud to state that I own the @justyy account as shown below
He is a villain.
That makes me sad to read. Now I have decided to start here on this platform and this is what happens here?
Oh man, if I had seen this before I changed my BTC to HIVE.
OK. they are all same one.
So now, Who is the dictator?
Hive witnesses looking at this post are too quiet.
Ask the Hive Witnesses. who is @darthknight..?
Are you even serious right now? Why should witnesses know who he is? Do they know who you are? Why? Because he has a fat wallet...?
Any bank in the world would have initiated procedures to cancel the “stolen credit card” asap. And trust me...I hate banks more than anything. This whole thing is a joke...
Why would anyone need to know that?
Let people be anonymous.
So he has few accounts - like me. What's the problem?
This war will just destroy us. But big accounts are involved and smaller accounts suffer.
!dramatoken
I think there are a lot more sock puppets to be exposed.
Not least of which is the idle whale stake.
When does that rear its head and dump?
I don't the think the exits are over just yet.
What has Blocktrades lied about in the past? I am not familiar with any of this and I don't think most people are either.
Lol I want the drugs you have man.
Excuse me, CIA. I need help.
Oh no, someone made money. THE HORROR! If only he offered a free service that didn't actually work and sucked from the reward pool, then he could be just like you @heimindanger.