There has been an attempt to create AI detector but they are not too accurate yet.I tested it with article on hive from @cmplxty and it passes on as written by AI 😂 though I am 100% he's not.
The problem is, AI and combined brain could be pretty powerful combination. A lot of people are using it nowadays but just to generate ideas or perfecting them. However, there are outliers here and there that fully write the article from AI because they're good with giving prompts. Sometimes it feared me the most when one is accused of using AI despite that it's just the way they talk. Some people like to use complicated words, verbs, and perhaps run-on sentences that could seem AI like but it's actually human. However, the are a few markers here and there that could make a writing passed on as AI and you also have to check the history of the person/the students.
The way I see it is that, writing but also defending their ideas vocally would probably shows their competence and see if their writing isn't AI or AI written. The thing is, AI can also summarize and refine sentences that also partially works like Grammarly and that is something acceptable I suppose as people also suggest to use grammarly to refine their sentences and make it more grammatically correct.
See my reply to livinguktaiwan below. I think as AI improves and as it starts to becomes more personalized (ie we train it on our own writing so it adopts our "voice") it will become nearly impossible to detect.
Ah yeah, we seem to forget that part where we can train AI to adapt our voice. Anyhow, ChatGPT is only fraction of All-things-AI as there are many tools out there like copyai, anyai that helps with content creation side of thing and people use it for commercial purposes too.
Yeah, this will only accelerate. It's always hard to realize you are within a massive social change in the moment, but.. we are in one now. By this time next year AI is going to be everywhere.
Ha that's interesting. In the twelve hours or so since writing the article I've spent more time on it and watching you tube vids etc and my view has developed further. Like the image AI, it can be co creation - I played with writing an article where I fed it my concepts, adjusted the prompts to fine tune, added a few sentences and wofds, deleted some, and voila, a half decent piece i don't ghink people would know was AI. The skill is in knowing what's a good piece or not and adjusting the AI for best result. Now that's not quite stealing, right? But I guess the curator discussion might be talking into account whether people are happy to reward something AI written when they themselves are spending time being entirely AI free. Interesting!