Pseudo-development of the economy through anti-social laws

Pseudo-development of the economy through anti-social laws, as the title of my post says, and these are my thoughts about the development, or the imaginary stability of the economies of many countries that did not follow the path that they declared in their constitutions.

Yes, in most constitutions, in bills of rights, you'll find lines about that. that all the resources and riches of the country belong to the people.

It seems to me. this should be the starting point for the development of the economy by increasing economic indicators aimed at improving the quality of life of citizens who. from birth, own untold wealth, as the constitutions say.

But, life shows that governments see an increase in economic development due to an increase in the number of bans and restrictions on the freedoms of those who are rich as Croesus.

They took the word "economy", which in Greek means home ownership, and stuck to it the word "economy" - frugality.

It seems that everything is in order, the economy should be economical, as the leaders of the world proletariat liked to say, but this is only possible due to the oppression of the freedoms of citizens.

Eat cheap sausage, drink less water ... and then. the country's economy will skyrocket, lol.

Let's take a look at these camps. like Moldova and Ukraine, which got out of the fetters of the communists and fell into other fetters, the fetters of those who consider Ecology. which we will talk about another time, that factor that can trample on the freedoms of people and break the whole way of life of the inhabitants of these countries, who, from generation to generation, have used it. what nature gives them.

First, in Moldova, and then in Ukraine, laws were passed prohibiting unauthorized grazing, which does not contribute to the development of livestock in the village.

I'm not sure what to be held hostage by European banks that give loans to support the economy, but dictate the environmental laws they invented the best way.

In fact, the EBRD, FISM, and the IMF are chameleons that will wait for the right moment and eat the fly that was looking for happiness in the wrong place.

It can be said that they directly threaten the poor segment of the population with their interference in the life of the country.

It can be said that they directly threaten the poor segment of the population with their interference in the life of the country.

In the truest sense of the word, they worsen the quality of their lives and deprive them of what the Constitution promises them.

As I said, having livestock on your farm, you should look at the regulatory authorities, who can fine you if your goat or cow eats grass beyond the boundaries of what is permitted.

Many people survive on what the forest can give them. Yes, sometimes, they could pick more mushrooms than they could eat and sell the surplus, but with beggarly pensions and wages, that was what gave them the next day. Now, mushroom picking is banned.

Quite recently, too. you could go to the pharmacy and buy any medical preparation, painkiller. or antibiotic, but, now, sale only by prescription. Would you like to wait in line to see a doctor during a pandemic in order to get a prescription?

Many people used to collect medicinal herbs, now, and the collection of medicinal herbs is prohibited. But, companies are being created, under the guise of government deputies, who are collecting mushrooms and herbs for processing and exporting abroad.

Grandmothers can no longer pick berries in the forest, but why do this? After all, they can go to the supermarket and buy a kilogram of berries, which will cost as much as a quarter of their pension.

Watching such things and events, I understand all the cynicism of the word "economy" in today's realities.

Ethconomics should be based on a foundation consisting of happy citizens of the country, and not destroy this foundation.

Photos taken with a Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 camera.

Author @barski

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta