You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: WARNING! The Precarious Future of Splinterlands: Splintermarket Fall, Splinterbots, Flawed Pack Release, New Legendaries (and cards in general), Voting Discrimination, Open Source botting? SPLINTERLANDS NEEDS YOUR HELP

in Splinterlands3 years ago (edited)

Before anything else. I suggested a captcha in a previous post and thought people would click the link to view it that would do something to (all those places I say click here for additional solutions from a previous post is said article). However despite how many people think a captcha is a good idea, every time it goes to feedback it is massively downvoted for some reason.

Thanks so so much for responding, I have respect for you as a card player and have enjoyed my matches against you in ranked and tournaments (often enough suffering defeat but always having fun). And you raised good points in your comments about scaring people, so I added a little section for people to read before they get the wrong idea in what I want this article to do.

The purpose of this article was not to just be doomy and gloomy (however I did want to get people's attention), but what I wanted was to have people speak their thoughts on this and have it be a public forum of discussion. And for such a good response which splinter would you like for your random RARE delegation for 15 days?

I added a section based on replies to preemptively answer and questions and sort of also explain how the article was not meant to knock the pack sale numbers (or the devs) or how many packs there are. And clear up some things about the intent of this article for those reading it. You have no idea how much I appreciate the feedback and comments.

I created a proposal actually also (615) if you want to vote on it, but I didn't want to seem like I was only promoting my proposal in this post (but I have since added it to this post as per your suggestion) this was to have the community submit their own solutions. Not mine alone. Submit what anyone thinks will work for player retention. I also added a section to clear up my intent in this article aswell, I wasn't trying to be a doomsday preacher. Overall I have hope and love Splinterlands (read my little section where I talk more about how much I respect the development and though into the gameplay) but think botting shouldn't be a "phantom player" statistic and more people should participate in the feedback section. Whatever your thoughts are.

I think continued transparency is important, and developers being active with the community is a good thing. However I think they should hire a PR person for the projected future of the project (The Biggest Leagues, because I believe the game itself is worthy of being at the table). If botting was transparent so that anyone hopping in (web2.0 users new to hive etc.) would know what they are jumping into, then maybe they would be even be more into it because of that fact. Rather than finding out about it later through their own research and potentially being soured or feeling tricked. This is a matter of perspective, as personally I don't mind bots as opponents. HOWEVER, It's when bots fight bots. It's the perspective of bots fighting bots SHOULDN'T make income. Bots fighting people should have that income potential and is a part of the game that is unlikely to go away. And if bots only earned when they beat a person that is more than fair. Bots should just not earn against another bot at least.

Again, I'm super appreciative of your reply and have nothing but respect (on and off the battlefield). Let me know which splinter you would like for your rare delegation. You earned it by saying your thoughts concisely and not pulling punches. Feel free to comment on this comment too, as the overall goal of this post was discussion.

Sort:  

Thanks first of all, for taking the time to write up such a detailed response to my post (that's not a given nowadays).

I will also have to at this point apologize for the tone of my post coming off as very negative and anti, because I believe you were very brave for voicing your opinion and showing that there's an element in the game, that has to be carefully monitored and preferably even "regulated" (even if it's not the most DeFi way to go about it). I just felt the original portrayal gave off a negative vibe...but I believe now at least, that you were merely polarizing to get eyes on the subject, and you surely accomplished that good sir. ;) This has been the talk of the Town (Hall...literally in the last one haha, not too shabby friend).

When next, we shall meet on the battlefield, we shall greet eachother as equals and brothers in arms. 🤜🤛

Don't worry about the rare delegation bro, but I do thank you for the offer...I'm sitting at Diamond III's doors organically since last season. Feel free to give it to someone else on my behalf though. I'm sure someone can use it more than me.

Good on you for revising the post and adding your feedback.splinterlands link, I believe that will be the best way to funnel people to your feedback suggestion. I'll go check it out and give it an up-vote, if it's for introducing a captcha. Very clever idea?