Hello community! This is your mastermind speaking...
Everyone was alarmed by the small, hypocritical Great Britain's decision to use depleted uranium shells in the few tanks it will send to Ukraine. These shells have also been used by NATO in every conflict since the Gulf War, but without having had major consequences compared to conventional munitions, unless you count the death of hundreds or perhaps even thousands of soldiers of the Atlantic Alliance due to the uranium dust with which they came into contact. From a purely military perspective, this action looks to be a display of enormous hubris and a testament to a tenacious will to carry on the battle, but it is actually the realization of defeat that drove this decision. Military-wise, this choice could result in the immediate destruction of a few more Russian tanks, but it most surely won't alter the course of the conflict. Without taking into account the fact that Russia not only has these projectiles at its disposal, but also effectively holds a monopoly over the processing of uranium through Rosatom, it could easily outperform the Westerners in terms of depleted uranium projectiles, even if it has no intention of using them on it's territory.
The use of depleted uranium projectiles, which are only effective in piercing armor and nothing more, would spread a poison across the battlefield that could contaminate crops, groundwater, animals, and people, leading to death and disease over time. However, this decision was made to exact revenge for the defeat that is now quite clearly looming and to which the US and Great Britain do not want to resign themselves. The powders that come from these missiles spread on the ground and continue to kill even after the battle, as happened and continues to happen in Serbia and Iraq. With the loss of the West in Moscow on a material and moral level, it will be the responsibility of reclamation and population transfers from contaminated regions without question, but the employment of these depleted uranium weapons has the potential to significantly alter the battlefield. This type of senseless retaliation sharply and plainly demonstrates the level of human depravity that the Anglosphere has attained.
London's action also helps to lessen the harm that the Chinese peace plan is causing because it essentially amounts to saying no without outright objecting to sitting down at a table, which may not be popular with a majority of people, even those in the West. The West would suffer its worst setback if discussions began as a result of a Chinese move since it would no longer feel like master and arbitrator at the same time, and also because of the archenemy they have chosen. Beijing's agenda is being marginalized by the mainstream media, which makes it seem to be internationally problematic.
Which, in a way, is true given that the West and only the West does not even want to examine it, despite the fact that it is logical and takes into account all sides' interests exactly like a genuine peace plan should. Bloomberg provides a pretty clear explanation of the issue, saying that the US administration is actually quite concerned about the Chinese peace initiative since its rejection blatantly signals to the rest of the world that the US is not interested in peace in Ukraine.
It is entirely accurate; as a result, Washington activated the British little dog to provide a new defense that, in the meanwhile, diverts attention away from Beijing's peace proposal. In any event, what one can now anticipate from a wounded empire that views anything that does not originate from Washington and does not respect its own conditions as meddling is reacting to peace proposals with depleted uranium.
Don't believe the lies! The truth sets us free! Have a good day !
image from here