I didn't put my name on a violent threat, I monitor that dude because of who he is.
Autovoting him is how i keep up with what he does next.
It is your interpretation that I support him.
That you think you can put motives in my head is very telling.
Why you think you can tell others what they are thinking is very autocratic of you.
You get to determine what is right and wrong for you, and only you.
When you start doing that to other people you may want to get your megalomania in check.
If you want to downvote my lowest possible autovote, that is your prerogative under steem's rules.
But, when you decide to burn my account of legitimately earned rewards, that is something else.
Gfy.
A negative vote would accomplish the same thing. I never considered the thoughts of the owners of the voting accounts much, other than if I see an account upvoting @noganoo I'm not going to think much about downvoting those accounts.
Rewards are earned at 7-day post age, anything until then is pending and change with votes, up or down.
Thanks for the !drama tokens
Steemauto doesn't downvote automatically genius.
Not all of us get to run our own custom interfaces.
But, now that you figuratively punched me in the nose rather than speak to me as an equal, you can kiss my ass.
Power may cause you to feel you can act with impunity, let's see how that works out for you, eh?
Don't dump that coin, I'm saving them to buy my grand kids ice cream.
See it from my perspective. Would you like it much if I had upvoted a poster that continually threatens your life and the lives of other Steemians, even if it was a 1% vote?
Ok, that excuses me from common human decency?
I can just run roughshod over you?
How about you just downvote the upvote and it is a wash?
Instead i get burned to the ground on the only post I have made to my nonprofit in months?
No, when you came off that post to bully me with threats you were out of bounds.
Accept it, and move on.
I know you're a stubborn guy and I am too, especially when confronted. Like non-newtonian fluids. Obviously my immediate approach wasn't useful, and I should know better.
I'm very stubborn when it comes to nog. Seeing an upvote on his post may give him a sense of support from you. It's not about the value of the vote in this case.
And we get to the heart of the matter,...
I know you guys got history.
Not exactly what all transpired, but you are certainly entitled to your opinion.
I think where you got off track was when you decided to force that opinion onto me.
I support nog's right to speak, too.
He may want to correct his transgressions committed against you.
He may want to add to them.
Either way, I would like to know about it.
At this point I track this story with an inconsequential upvote to his posts that normally doesn't pay out.
This vote solely serves to keep me informed of progress in the matter.
You are free to stop the rewards from changing hands, but interfering with the speech is out of bounds, to me.
I would like to see y'alls conflict resolved, that doesn't happen without communications.
So, I am merely tracking a high drama conversation.
I agree you are justified in holding your position towards nog.
I don't think you should mow down innocent bystanders.
I don't really care if you guys kiss and make up, or kill each others like dogs, but that little vote is the only way I don't space off this little dramafest.
You, of course, have to do what you do.
People upvoting threatening posts aren't bystanders. Thanks for having this conversation so I know where you're coming from. Again, poor approach by me. I've given nog multiple chances (too many) but he's proven to be a manipulative person that is permanently fucked in the head. Once I realized that, I realized he's irredeemable.